Mustafa criticises wage increases: That means we're the best, the best, the best.

Raising wages through the Law for Salaries will cost the government around 120m euros and it is said that our doctors now have the highest salaries in the region.

Linked to all these developments this beginning has reacted sharply, the chairman of the Democratic League of Kosovo, Isa Mustafa.

It through a Facebook status has stinged the political class, as according to him they do not deal with the budget but with the votes.

This is the full post of Isa Mustaf:

Dear citizens,

It is trumpeting that this government proved bold in raising salaries through the Law for Salaries, at a new cost of about 120m euros. It is said that our educators and doctors will receive the highest wages in the region, that civil servants can be compared to those in European countries in wage terms. That's what the Speaker of the Parliament, the Prime Minister, PDK GP Chief, government spokesman, Health Minister... They all talk about budgeting and economics. They're talking about votes.

According to this, we are the best, the best. Others in the region, who are more developed than we are, are not knowing how to raise wages.

None of them talk about the fact that we are the poorest country in Europe and the region, that we are barely able to cover import by 10 per cent export, that private sector wages, where we have triple employees compared to the public sector, are much lower; we are the country with the highest unemployment rate of about 30%, and that about 2 billion budget revenues are destined for salaries and social transfers, lowering investment and development capacity.

The family standard of educators, doctors, police officers, civil servants... and no one will grow up just raising their salaries, but opening up new jobs for the unemployed, who are also their family. No sound mind, therefore, reasons for boasting in such actions and such decisions. Except for the divisive logic.

That decision is being attributed to being unconstitutional. In this country, the meaning of what is constitutional and what is not has been lost. There's a question of who can expect that a court, captured, constitutional, which allowed 100% of government salaries to rise, now means that a Law for Salaries is unconstitutional. It would be easier to say that the Court itself is more unconstitutional than constitutional. IM