PSD Pantina: The problem between the VV and LDK is not the president

Pantin through a Facebook text says the hylja stands elsewhere, as according to her, the VV and LDK know that even if they agree on the president, they cannot choose it without voter turnout by any opposition parties.

But what it looks like is something else. The two parties negotiating coalition ties are not ready to assume the responsibility that awaits them for continuing dialogue and signing the agreement with Serbia”, she writes.

Her post:

The problem is not the position of the president, the hylja is somewhere else!

Within both parties negotiating to form the new government, there are people who well know that even if they agree to the candidate for president today, such an agreement cannot be implemented. At least not without the consent of one of the opposition parties. The coalition expected to be built even if it joins List Srpska will have 77 deputies (LV 29 +) The LDK 28+ non-Serb minorities 10+ List Srpska 10) are known that to elect the president, at least 80 MPs must participate in the vote.

So the election of the next president depends also on opposition parties, and the participation of any of them in the vote, of course, means reconfiguration of the government or going to the polls. Then why all this noise about the President's position now?

But it looks like the hyle is somewhere else. The two parties negotiating coalition ties are not ready to assume the responsibility that awaits them for continuing dialogue and signing the agreement with Serbia.

Reaching/ signing the agreement can also be postponed, as did the ratification of the demarcation agreement with Montenegro, but that it will be achieved and signed, we all know. The delay in ratification of the demarcation agreement cost us at least four years of visa liberalisation, postponing the agreement with Serbia we do not know what price it will have.

But by then, Facebook mercenaries will continue with insults, insults and lynching of anyone who thinks otherwise or doesn't like the batats of their chief like them: “No, we're getting “; “I'm picking first, not I'm picking first. The next battle would likely be: “You were guilty, not you.
And it matters at least we've got Ver '%s'.