The prosecution in charge of the person who died eight years ago.

The State Prosecutor is not leaving <x0RLhat” the people who died many years ago. Unaffirmed their vital status, the Constitutional Prosecutor in Pristina has continued with the establishment of charges against persons who no longer live, reports “Justice Vow”. In fact, to the person who had died many years earlier, this prosecutor [...]
Unaffirmed their vital status, the Constitutional Prosecutor in Pristina has continued with the establishment of charges against persons who no longer live, reports “The Law on Justice”.
In fact, to the person who had died many years earlier, this prosecutor charged him with two charges, which he raised some six years after the accused had passed away.
Initially, on June 13th 2017, Pristina's Prosecutorship charged the N.A. that it had committed the unauthorized criminal work “connection to services”, while with the second indictment filed on June 16, 2017, he was charged with having committed criminal work “the arrival of municipal services”.
Acting on the first indictment filed on June 13, 2017, the Constitutional Court in Pristina, on May 30th 2019, had scheduled the initial session, but that the accused had not presented in that trial.
Later, this court on 14 August addressed the Pristina municipality with a warrant for verifying its vital status.
Acting on Pristina's second Constitutional Pristina prosecution, this court on June 20th 20th, 2019, had scheduled the initial session against the N.A. accused of stealing municipal services.
Similarly, this court again on November 5, 2019, was addressing the Pristina municipality to carry out verifications concerning the life status of the accused N.A.
The Pristina municipality, November 8, 2019, had announced to the tribunal that it had changed its life on May 26, 2011.
That announcement, the municipality had also attached the death certificate issued by the Civil Status Office in Pristina.
Following the confirmation of this fact - making situation, Judge Fatime Dricak, acting on Article 253, paragraph 1 had made a decision to cease the criminal procedure and to reject two separate decisions in this case.
The Constitutional Prosecutor in Pristina, on June 13, 2017, had filed charges against the N.A. due to the suspicion that he has carried out three cases of criminal activity “unauthorised access to services”, from Article 321 of KPRC.
According to this indictment, the N.A. was charged that on February 3rd, March 1st and April 19th 2017, at his home in Pristina, with the aim of benefiting municipal service, he misused electricity in such a way that after removing from the electrical grid, he bypassed it and connected directly from the pillars at home through cable 2 ask 16 m2 am Al, providing without the authorization and authorized supplier for electricity.
According to the second indictment filed by the Constitutional Prosecutor in Pristina on 16 June 2017, the N.A. is accused of committing criminal work “the arrival of municipal services”, from KPRK's Article 320.












