a few seconds agoRejected P ZAP, Vetevendosje complains in Supreme for diaspora votes
Periskopi(7 years ago)
(7 years ago)The Vetevendosje Movement has decided to submit the complaint for votes recently coming from the diaspora to the Supreme Court, as this complaint was rejected by PZAP, writes Periscopi. The news was made known by Vetevendosje through a media communique. They have blamed PZAP for delaying the certificate of results. “Remember [...]
The news was made known by Vetevendosje through a media communique.
They have blamed PZAP for delaying the certificate of results.
“Remember that the main factor that has caused this extension of the CEC's task calendar is the Election Panel for Anxiety and Parashtre. There are a considerable number of arbitrary decisions of this institution, of recounting, the result. And what's more arbitrary is disrespecting the Supreme Court's judgments regarding the margin votes. Under normal conditions, only one Supreme Court ruling would have been enough, for all the same cases of placing in analogy on the part of the CEC and PZAP”, is said in this communiqué.
Below, find the full response of Vetevendosje:
As long as the recount continued and the results were not announced, we realized that at the address of the CEC, 392 packages of ballot papers were reached.
The Supreme Court, in spirit and content on two previous cases, has confirmed the right of voters from the exile that their timely and pre-election ballots be counted and included in the final outcome.
The Supreme Court's judgments should serve as a sufficient basis for the CEC to count these 392 packages, but after refusing to count and reject the PZAP to order the CEC, we have addressed the case to the Supreme Court.
The right to vote as constitutional and universal right must be protected and respected. While each vote coming to the CEC address and initiated by registered voters and within the deadline, it must be counted and included in the final outcome.
Very often some parties involved in the process have claimed complaints are delaying the certificate. Remember, the main factor that has caused this extension of the CEC's calendar of activities is the Electoral Panel for Anxiety and Parashta. There are a considerable number of arbitrary decisions of this institution, of recounting, the result. And what's more arbitrary is disrespecting the Supreme Court's judgments regarding the margin votes. Under normal conditions, only one Supreme Court ruling would have sufficed, for all the same cases of placing in analogy on the part of the CEC and PZAP.
We expect the Supreme Court to reconfirm this right once again and order their count without delay.
