Actuals against two defendants for misuse of voting

Peja's foundation prosecutor has filed charges against defendants, A.G., and B.G., due to the criminal offence of voting rights. According to the prosecution, the defendant, A.G., is charged with being charged with this year's October 6th general elections organised on the high date in the village of Percevel, about the hour [...]
Peja's foundation prosecutor has filed charges against defendants, A.G., and B.G., due to the criminal offence of voting rights.
According to the prosecution, the defendant, A.G., is charged with the 6th of this year's general election, organised by the upper date, in the village of Cline, about 1300 p.m., at lower high school “witnesses”, at the polling of 0818C/01R, with his brother's identification vote on behalf of the other person A.G, who had not voted on election day because he lives in Italy.
When, the defendant B.G., is charged with placing the commissioner's quality (Actor of the Election Council) in high place, it allows defendants A.G. to vote on behalf of the other person. With these actions, there is strong suspicion that defendants have fulfilled the elements of the criminal act described as high. The prosecutor of the case in the case of standing up that the indictment has proposed to the court that the defendants be found guilty and condemned according to the law on criminal acts, which are charged with”, the prosecutor's communiqué said.
At the same time, the prosecutor of the case has proposed that against defendants B.G, be pronounced additional punishment “halting the exercise of profession, activity or duty”.












