Morena Tarak case: The prosecution claims the case has not yet been closed

The Constitutional Prosecutor in Pristina, through an announcement, has made it known that this prosecutor has not closed the case of singer Morena Taraku, who has been dealing with the extension of the type “Bentley” car. The report states that a decision was asked by the prosecutor to be issued that will be identified [...]
The Constitutional Prosecutor in Pristina, through an announcement, has made it known that this prosecutor has not closed the case of singer Morena Taraku, who has been dealing with the extension of the type “Bentley” car.
The report states that a decision was issued by the prosecutor to identify the car as new or used in the processing procedure.
“Foundation Procurory in Pristina, with a view to fair information of the opinion, feels obliged to clarify that, in 15,10.2019, this prosecutor has accepted from the Kosovo Customs Investigation Unit a Informative Report concerning the extension of the brand's car “Bently<62>, and has been asked by this prosecutor to issue a decision that will identify the car as new or used in its zoning procedure <3> writes the Pristina Constitutional Prosecutor.
Therefore, it is not what is written in the media, that the case is closed to the prosecutor, for the same day, on 15,10.2019, the prosecutor of the case has issued authorisation for the enterprise of preliminary investigative actions. The document in question is an official document that has been given to customs investigators, under which the same have been obliged to take investigative action to whitewash the truth about the extension of the branding car “Bently”, mentioned in the Information Report. This document in no way has dared to be published. ”
The prosecution suggests that the information in the case was not provided by the beacons.
“As far as the signalers are concerned, the State Attorney, respects, defends, and implements the Signal Protection Law, but in concrete cases it's not about the signalers, as it is written in the media, because the signaler doesn't enjoy legal protection if he has or may know that the information revealed is false. Therefore, information published in the media does not match the actual and judicial situation in the concrete” report Pristina Constitutional Prosecutor.













