Mirena: That's why Halil Kastrati has the right to publicize his humanitarian activity.

Mirena asks if the work of Kastrati or anyone else like him hadn't been made public, then how would the funds be raised for families in need.

According to Mirena, the most important thing is to benefit the needy.

Halil Kastrati last night on a television show showed that 17 charity homes will be donated on the day of the anniversary of Kosovo's Independence.

Here's Ilir Mirena's full post on Facebook:

I don't really understand if it's ethical if the charities are made public, whether they're following cameras, or if they're unknown to the public.
Now religions and an unmarked ethics guide that age or charity should not become public. But if Halil Kastrati and others hadn't made their humanitarian jobs public, how would they manage to raise funds and also influence others on similar acts of charity if we didn't know about their work?
I'm against showing or shobising them, because with good luck or old age it doesn't solve the social problems of citizens, but it shouldn't have to keep them unknown to the public.
Exception will buy markets that daily Bajrami under TV surveillance distributes a couple of kilos of rice and sugar, but I think it's best that the charity become public and have media attention.
Because the important thing is to benefit those who need it. And that's a lot, and there will be./Periscopi/