This is Eddie Rama's rejected son, thirty-year-old (Photo)

The question not a bit of adversarial in the media about the assassination denied before Edi Rama's court for his son Grigori is cleared through a document of the court's decision. This document is not published for the first time, but Citynews has been able to obtain a copy of it. Edi Rama has been indicted in court [...]
The question not a bit of adversarial in the media about the assassination denied before Edi Rama's court for his son Grigori is cleared through a document of the court's decision. This document is not published for the first time, but Citynews has been able to obtain a copy of it.
Edi Rama has been indicted in court by her former husband, prominent actress Matilda Makoci, for rejecting the ceremony for their 1990-born Grigor son.
According to this decision, indictee Edi Rama has filed claims that he does not bear children for medical reasons because he has been sick and has refused to be called his child. Since Rama has later refused to do the right medical checks for proving his claims, the court has taken good care of his fathership for the son, Grigor.
But it's not actually this delicate point of decision. The charges brought by Edi Rama at the time based on the paranoids of a possible allied relationship between his former wife Makoci and his father during vacations with his parents in Vlora, where he was not present, is also a point that testifies to the painter's personality problems at the time, but to a man in whose hand are the fates of our country today.
Below the text of the document in the photo:
The process participants are marriage mates. They signed a legal marriage in 12.10. 1987. The wedding gave birth to his child Grigor, a d. 1990. As explained by court trials, marriage mates have generally had good relations. The defendant has begun to behave coldly when he learned that the plaintiff was pregnant. At that time, in January 1990, the indictee has cooled off with him, and they have not had relations since. The defendant's claims have been made that he does not bear children for medical reasons and has refused to be called his child. However, the defendant has declined laboratory examinations, so the matter of child pregnancy is not in doubt. The plaintiff says he has charged that during the past summer he has taken a vacation in Vlora alone, accompanied by his parents, Christaqi and Annette. This time, according to him, coincides with the period of pregnancy”.












