KMDLNJ against intervention in the garden case “YKA” in Prizren

The KMDLNJ Regional Centre in Prizren has expressed itself against the intervention of Prizren municipality inspectors in garden “Yllka”

KMDLNJ through a media statement requires the parties to resolve the conflict through the Founding Court, each having its own claims, whether to fulfill contract obligations or not.

According to this council, the behaviour of municipal officials is arbitrary, and as such presents violations of basic human rights.

Full response:

KMDLNj against arbitrary intervention

KMDLNY Monitor, Q. R in Prizren on 2008.2018 has visited the management of the NGO Pedaks KPS, which managed to run Ylka in Prizren. In this case, directors of this trip have announced that today at 11,00 municipal inspectors in the Prizren municipality, accompanied by police, have asked the Pedak KPS management to release the facility of the Ylka Garden without harming and removing the inventory, which is inside the facility.

The notice of the municipality says Pedak's leaders have acted contrary to the concession contract and, according to them, there are a series of violations by the current management. However, these are rejected by director M. Y. (Turkish states) which requires that contracts be re-opened in full.

The director of Pedaks has introduced the contract, which says: In case of no eventual agreements, the subject of conflict resolution is the Constitutional Court. Meanwhile, in the announcement, to cut off the contract and release the children's gardening object eykulla in Prizren, issued by the Prizren municipality, signed by its chairman, dt.02.08.2018, it is said that this must be done in the 15th day term. Even Pedak's legal defender states that this claim cannot be held, nor could it be executed, so long ago because in the arrangement for concession, besides Article, in the event of conflict, from which it wants authority, for decision, it is also the fact that this is an announcement and not a decision, also illegal, and without legal grounds.

The KMDLNJ, asks the parties to resolve the dispute through the Constitutional Court, each having its own claims, whether to fulfill contract obligations or not. The behaviour of municipal officials is arbitrary, and as such presents violations of human rights.

So, KMDLNJ, it's in favour of solving this problem through the Constitutional Court mechanism and not with arbitrary interference that might have political character in such cases, unless justice says its own word.