Subheader PDK: LDK with political tears against Hashim Thaci

Hoti has analysed the differences of opinion within the LDK, which she has said are the result of electoral interests.

“I continue to believe in the seriousness and stability of the LDK as a politically formed and mature party”.

If a deputy chairman says President Thaci has no authorization to negotiate with Serbia (Agim Veliu), then that is a clear truth. No one can change the rules of the game like whims to individuals. If another deputy speaker says the state institution must be respected (Loffi Haziri), then that is a fact that has standard within it. If a deputy chairman of it (Remember Shala) seeks the parties' consensus on major agreements, then this is a self-understanding standard of societies that have respected states at the level of advanced democratic states of the world”.

“Mirpo, the oil of a part of it in terms of rejecting the Kosovo dialogue process with Serbia and linking this issue with early elections with legitimacy or institutional crisis is electoral oil. So, there are political tears”.

And since there are many respected and respected poets and writers in LDK, I would have tried to say a bunch of poetic words: all this is an electoral political document on dialogue and President Thaci”.

The amount of thoughts within this party is normal for the period it is going through. The new part of civil society accession has typical neo-Yugoslav mentality. Because this is where the conditioning, the credentials and the discretion of this mind” begins and ends.

Hoti has stressed that President Thaci can lead the dialogue because he is now an impartial party personality, while this impartiality has cost him The PDK's with 800,000 votes in last elections.

“Position The PDK is simple and clear about Dialogue. The PDK is for determining the criterion of institutional efficiency of dialogue. That's it. If it is to be discussed at the prime minister level, then it will go to that level, if it is to be discussed at the president's level, then let the definition be. But we can't go into dialogue with the thinking of the tribe or of the neo-Yugoslav hongoonjo.

President Thaci is not a person without error and faultlessness. But this cannot cover the fact that in the context of the dialogue, President Thaci is an unaffordable party for Serbia. It is on dialogue and on Serbia”.

If Kosovo has this priority in the field of dialogue, then who is interested not to have that personality in dialogue? Only Serbia and its grandchildren in Kosovo. Because President Thaci is no longer in the political party. As he went we lost about 80 thousand votes. So the PDK paid its price. President Thaci witnessed his autonomy and political impartiality. So why do you wonder about that?