Year Paris with 90 contract employees

Although under the civil service law, for such appointments, a simplified recruiting procedure is implemented, according to the audience, the municipality of Year had applied these procedures only to two of those engaged, while not to the rest.
The “Locations for which these agreements have been made are primarily about regular positions and not about providing specific services, as defined in the” agreement, the National Auditing Office report said.

According to this report, the risk of bypassing the recruiting procedures in case of binding contracts for special services may result in the commitment of inadequate persons to performing required services.

This also does not provide equal treatment for all potential competitors”, the report notes.

The National Auditor Office has also found shortcomings in the municipality of the Year in the process of partitioning and monitoring subsidies.

The municipality had earmarked subsidies worth 15 thousand euros for KF Vlasnia and 10 thousand euros for KF Vitia, but the latter had not offered financial and austerity reports to justify spending tools.

According to the audience, the municipality of the Year had made no agreement on where rights and obligations between the municipality and the beneficiary of the subsidy would be determined, with what benefits the beneficiaries would be responsible for the report.

“
Based on municipal regulations on subsidies sharing, the beneficiaries of subsidies shared by the municipality are obliged to submit financial and narrative reports.

These subsidies should also precede an agreement defining the rights and responsibilities of each side.

The lack of reports on spending tools as a result of the non-responsability of beneficiaries may result in deviations from their profit targets and low value for paid money”, the audit report says.

The audience has stressed that shortcomings in the application of agreements between the parties may influence the beneficial parties not to be responsible in implementing the targets and reporting proper for the spent means.

Another problem faced in the municipality of the Year by the National Audition Office is the signing of contracts worth higher than anticipated.
The audience has found that in four projects, contracts were signed at higher value than their envisioned value in the Instruments' Need and Access Declaration and the tender file.

In the project, “The construction of football sports fields and volleyball”, the projected value was 40 thousand euros, while two tear-paid contracts were worth 121,175 euros, at the “bus station construction in the Year” the projected value was 20,000 euros, while the contract worth 39,519 euros.

Also in the “Ration of the Nation's Street Witnesses in the year” project, the projected value was 123,151 euros (co-finance between MAPL 100 thousand euros and municipality 23,151 euros) while the contract was signed at 152,218 euros, and the “Assalmation of the Germove chamber”, the projected value of the contract was 150 thousand euros (financed by MI) while the contract was signed at 285 euro.

“The signing of contracts worth higher than anticipated risks failure to realise them as a result of lack of tools and may at the same time jeopardise the implementation of other projects because of the possibility of executing payments through judicial decisions or closures”, the audit report continues.

Another ZKA find in the municipality of the Year is also the poor management of cashable accounts.

According to the municipal report, it had not presented in the annual financial mirrors, the accounts cashable by the directorate for public services, worth 15,261 euros.

This was about using public space.

This had happened as a result of insufficient communication on the security of data between the finance office and the directorate for public services.

The municipality had not taken active measures to record cashable accounts, causing them not to mark declines from last year.

This is due to the lack of establishing mechanisms from the municipality for increasing their”, the report said.

From the audience as a danger, there is a lack of complete information about the cashable accounts, which results in ineffective management of them and is unable to take adequate measures to access them.

“The lack of concrete measures for L/A downloading affects the failure to implement the planned revenues. At the same time, the failure to present the exact displays leads to a mispronouncement of the financial position, where in the future the opinion of auditing”, the report concludes.

Lack of construction permits, inspection surveillance and use permits are another finding of the audience.

Under the construction law, construction contracts are required to equip with relevant documentation such as construction permits, inspection and access.

The municipality of the Year in 12 contracts had not applied construction permits and inspection surveillance, while in three projects for which technical accession had been made, no certificates of access had been issued.

Furthermore, the technical accession report was very weak in information, not maintaining the essential elements of the contract. Initiation of projects without completing documentation according to the construction law requirements may affect the quality and impasse in implementing these” projects, the report says.