Mattoshi for Anton Ceta: Not Special Names but Important Events

He has said that the country that the Organising Council has called for the September establishment for Anton Ceta is considered inappropriate because it is small.

“We have opened the discussion from 2005 for Anton Ceta's September. This September we wanted to place in a square that would be called “Conciliatory Chief Anton Qeta”. The country the Organising Council has requested is considered inadequate. ”

The request of the Organising Council would only make sense if even the institute bore Anton Tray's name, but such a request did not come”, Matosh said.

Matoshi has said that respect of the Albanological Institute has been seen over the years.

The Institute has done everything in its power to Anton Ceta, has made some of his references. We have published four works by Professor Anton Ceta, no other employees have done this honour, except that we have published a work to Bajram Krasniqi”, he has declared, states Telegrafi.

The director of the Albanological Institute has said that there is a decision that no September of any particular person should be imposed before this institution.

The position not to have Septembers before the Albanology Institute, but only one obelisk does not mean Anton Cetta, it means all personalities, because we have five branches of this institute, and in each branch we have two distinct personalities”.

He has said there have been various requests to identify the Albanological Institute with specific names.

We have a request that the institution be named after Idriz Ajjet, but our request is that the Albanological Institute not be identified with specific names, but with significant events for the Albanian nation”, Hysen Matoshi further stated.