Education faculty rejects the diploma themes of 20 students who copied

Of the 200 students who have been on the list to graduate in the June deadline, 20 were removed from the list yesterday about 8:00 on July 11th. Students have been handed a list of social networks whose names do not have the right to graduate.

The list has mentioned four general reasons that apply to all twenty students: disrespecting the faculty's doracac, non-connection to research programs, repeating subjects, and copying.

The students reported the call. com saying that despite the professor's continued discussion of the subject, they were not surprised by the shortcomings inside.

Student of the primary program Leonora Berisha says that during the process of the theme work, the mentor has repeatedly praised her for her work on the subject, so she is surprised at the announcement the day before the graduation date she is not allowed to protect her.

The Professor told us everything was okay. We did all the procedures, but about eight or nine o'clock of the evening a list was published that said students who don't have names there can't graduate. When I called my mentor, he told me that the reason for the annulment was banal and they decided at the last moment to reason that the topics were out of the program and that they are repeated subjects. For no student decisions have been detailed, but have formulated a comprehensive list of the same reasons.”, Berisha said.

She relates that after publishing the list, she contacted her mentor who had not been aware of such a list.

But even the time when these students have been warned, this student is unacceptable.

The “Ments have not been informed until the last moment. Last night, we've been notified because a week ago it's okay. If our topics were wrong why the mentors didn't call us earlier, I did six months of research, I have the subject ready. I did the Master in Sociology but I came here to study here too because I found a job. They gave us nothing in writing. Our professors were on the commission. We've even asked the Ministry of Education, they didn't have the right to take matters away without consulting the mentor”, she relates.

Majlinda Gelay, pro-deciman for education lessons at the Faculty of Education, says that this faculty possesses a mitter that helps students work the degree theme and has been asked to manage on its basis.

It shows that the three-member commission formed for examining the subjects of 200 students for the deadline has been overloaded, and therefore there have been concessions.

The last year's Education Account has created a glove and demanded that the staff respect that glover that helps to map a good theme in Bachelor. It's a clear and simple guide that helps students. We didn't want to be part of media stories where they're talking about plagiarature topics or themes that only changed covers and we've taken preventative steps, however, at the Education School there's been an anarchy and a number of very large students with 700 students on just one program and with a small staff.

That's the deadline we've been looking for from students who, with a degree-related app, didn't come to defend their diplomas on the day of graduation to come with three copies of the commission that happened in the past. We've had 200 requests for this degree protection deadline, we form a three-member commission for two pre-school and primary programmes, which had a lot of work, and until yesterday they haven't been able to review all the topics.”, Gelaj said.

One of the 20 students who has been denied the opportunity to defend the subject of graduation on condition of anonymity told about the call.com that on yesterday's 11th evening, it was informed of the inability to protect the subject for this deadline.

We got the name on the student list with the diploma yesterday, but 10 minutes later we got word we can't get a diploma. Mentor told me that the decision has come from the dean and correct him. We have even contacted Declan they have told us that at 4: 00 p.m., wait for the” verdict, he said.

However, according to the prodecans, these 20 students have not respected the faculty manual, there have been topics that have not contained research, and have not adapted to content with the program that they studied, so they have responded, even though late.

Geaj also indicated that the reactor has been informed about the case and that the decision is expected for these professors, who have had concessions on the student diploma topics they've been through.

“I have identified 20 themes that have not met standards or criteria. So they haven't respected the manual, so there have been subjects that have no research or themes that the research doesn't relate to. Like. The polluted waters and their treatment technologies, or its weather and forecast on the pre-school program. These are topics that have no connection to the initial program.

At our faculty there are three or four mentors who have not respected the manual and the faculty demands because they have been overloaded. Geaj points out that this should not affect lowering their reputation because, as she claims, there have been very good themes that have been learned by the same professors.

We've informed the reactor, but no decision has been made. We don't want to condemn them because such a mistake has occurred, but we prevented the situation. We arranged with the students, gave them an additional deadline to correct the subjects, and gave you other models, and they had two weeks to prepare so that they wouldn't miss their employment competition”, State said.

The Faculty of Education procedure said it insists on hiding the identity of these professors who caused this mess because they want to give you an opportunity to improve.

We can't give them names because we haven't even mentioned them on the published list because of our colleague and in the hope that it will never happen. We'll give them a chance. In September, we'll look at all the professors if they've met these standards.

After meeting the students with the commission, which had controlled the topics, they say the decision was made for some of these students to change titles and literature, and some others to the content.

They were promised that on Monday (July 16th) they will be able to graduate with improved topics.