Truth and lies about the Battle of Kosovo

Medieval history lawmaker Muhamet Mala says historical facts testify that Kosovo's famous battle did not differ from the usual battles leading the Balkan occupation from the Ottoman Empire. You even think that Kosovo's second battle was more important than the first, writes today “Koha Ditore”. [...]
Medieval history lawmaker Muhamet Mala says historical facts testify that Kosovo's famous battle did not differ from the usual battles leading the Balkan occupation from the Ottoman Empire. You even think that Kosovo's second battle was more important than the first, writes today “Koha Ditore”.
Albanian subx0>-old Albanian writer”, “Medieval Albanian History “, “entry into the history of religions”, “historical geographo of the Balkans” and “Histor of the conservative religions” at the University of Pristina, “Pristina<11>, says Serbs began using the Battle of Kosovo when it was supposed to be in the Serbian nationalism and pre-Christianism service.
Mala says in an interview for the <x0ECH” that Albanians under Skenderbeu's leadership fought a quarter of a quarter for the protection of European values, when Ottomans were trying to consolidate the conquest in the Balkans.
It says that the Serbs, Greeks and the Orthodox Bulgarians maintained their identity by subjecting themselves to the Ottoman vassality.












