The Constitution rejects Surdul's complaint, no new choice in Kamenica

The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Kosovo has rejected the candidate's request for mayor of Kamenica from the LDK ranks, Shaip Surdul, which it has described as “incriminately unsubstantiated”. The applicant had submitted a request to the Court, through which he had sought to assess the constitutionality of the Election Panel decision [...]
The applicant had submitted a request to the Court, through which he had sought to assess the constitutionality of the Election Panel's decision on Ances and Parashtre (PZAP).
Surdul, in his request, claimed that the controversial decision of PZAP violated him “ [the] right guaranteed [of] individual freedom with the Constitution” for reasons, that according to him, the Central Election Commission (KQZ) had certified Mr. There's Kastrati for the mayor of the Kamenica municipality against Article 9 of Law No. 03/L-072 for Local Elections in the Republic of Kosovo.
Furthermore, as the Constitutional Court says, the forger in his request did not exactly clarify which right guaranteed by the Constitution has been violated.
The court found that PZAP had rejected the pre-prosecutor's complaint for procedural reasons and has not examined the pre-consistent claims in his nearby complaint PZAP, after PZAP had rejected the complaint as unsuccessful. As a result, the Court concluded that the architer has not specified which fundamental rights and freedoms protected by the Constitution have been violated, as a result of PZAP's superior decision as defined by Article 48 of the Law and, furthermore, has not backed his claims on how the procedure before PZAP has been unfair or arbitrary to<18x1>.
“Therefore, the Court declared the request of the unacceptable forger as clearly unbased on constitutional grounds”, the Constitutional decision said.












