They don't agree to the statute of Shrapcha

During the review of this statute, differences arose between the Union and the Trepca Board. Therefore, the commission estimated that for further review of this statue, it is necessary to form a working group that will review and harmonise the positions of the Union, the Trepca Board and the Ministry of Economic Development, kp broadcasts.

Supervisor Board Chairman of “Trepca, St. A.”, Ardian Syla, has said there has been much debate over the statute, mainly on social issues.

“We have handed over the statute as set forth in the Ministry of Economic Development, and now we expect to pass through further procedures, which are up to the adoption of the Parliament of the Republic of Kosovo, and the church wanted to say that as chairman of the Trepca Supervising Board, but the thought of all members of the board of oversight is to pass as quickly as possible in order to open the way to the registration of the action company, as before, and the new Trepca as we are calling it, with work<> he has said.

Syla has proposed that you consider the article, so that there will be debate between the union and the board.

Happily Sadiku, chairman of the “Trepca Union, has said the board has failed to take their concerns into account.

This has been our absolute concern, that this draft statute has already been taken from the copyrighted board and turned back to the Ministry of Economic Development with two remarks, those two remarks have been definitely reasonable, I reason that they were, but still the Ministry of Economic Development together with the Government has turned back, and the board's chairman has made these improvements without a quorum, with four people, and has turned them backwards, which has made a legal violation, the board's leader. Now that we have meetings our concerns have never been taken to base by the Trepca Board, we are shareholders and they should know that we are shareholders, we represent our interests 20 percent of our shares,”, he said.

Sala Berisha Shala, who has voiced distrust that the law has come with these cited violations, disagrees.

I don't think that until this material came to this place, this important document has come with violations as you're mentioning it, lack of quorum, and so, I don't think it's possible for the government to do that, to bring an important document into the panel of procedural violations, to them I'm telling you that you analyzed well, of course it's first and by law for Trepca to decide the quo, how decisions are made”, it was expressed.

The top political adviser in the Ministry of Development, Ibrahim Rexhepi, has indicated it is the general interest for the work to be done as soon as possible.

There is a delay from 2016 to now, and due to these delays, the approach of the Ministry of Economic Development has been to form a team that has been working the document, and it is only in operation, and to facilitate the work of the board. It may be a shame that this approach is now misinterpreted, not to say that there are manipulations about this”, he said.

However, LDK deputy Hykmete Bajrami has reacted to this.

You've taken the government in September and you can't afford to neglect the job, that means nine months, and then you come to the parliament to put pressure on us for a week. Absolutely, that's a draft Trepca statute today, there's no way to get past this commission, because we have our observations”, Bajrami said.

Sala Berisha Shala has read the statute, showing that the headquarters of this enterprise will be in Mitrovica, adding that this society can exercise activity both within Kosovo's territory and abroad.

For “the unlimited extension of society” there were disagreements on the commission, initially rejected by Vetevendosje MP Libran Aliu. This article behind these differences has been erased. The government will meet 80 percent of the shares, while 20 percent of them will be workers.

On the other hand, MP Lieburn Aliu has asked for clarity over the point, which speaks of Trepca's assets outside Kosovo.

“Must be defined clearly as the founding capital of Trepca and in accordance with its purpose of the statute, so with Article one, here I've already proposed to list, now should they be listed within the article, or by the annex, I don't know, but we can discuss it, but we have to go in, and especially be taken into account because there's no mention of the Trepca ass that are outside Kosovo<1>, he said.

At the start of the meeting, the chip was voted in from the June 12th meeting.