Appeals Court Shows Why Enver Hasani Was Released

KA LLXO.com announced today that the Court of Appeals has acquitted Enver Hasani of the verdict since the Constitutional Court was sentenced to 1 year in prison on bail. Apelit has found that the first-degree decision was unfounded, and has particularly been critical of the Pristina University sector's testimony, Marjan Dema.

Appeals after assessing Enver Hasani's defender's complaints have found that the fact that Enver Hasani under preliminary agreement with accused Hakif Veliu has not been proven with the intention of benefiting wealth illegally for company I The SN has forged-changed the original contract to translate books from English into Albanian.

No evidence is argued at which location and at what time Enver Hasani and the other two indictees, how they agreed, and how”, is said in the Appeals' decision, which cleared Enver Hasani from the prosecution.

Special attention is also given to the testimony of the current sector, Marjan Dema, who had been a guest witness from the prosecution in the process.

The testimony of witness Marjan Dema according to this court's assessment is extremely unacceptable. This is only due to the fact that his testimony given to the investigation is diametrically contrary to the one given in judicial examination, but also the fact that he has offered no evidence to argue his words”, says the reason for Apel's decision.

But with regard to this witness, Apel further appreciates the testimony of the Rector Marjan Dema by finding contradictions in his statements in the investigative procedure with those said in question.

“actually in investigations with no word does incriminating the accused Enver Hasani, and in the judicial review, voluntarily submitted in the name of justice to testify despite the fact that at that time it was the Finance Prorector declares the contract connected between the ISN and the UPA has been initiated, supervised and strictly followed by Enver Hasani so I have no connection with the contract because the contracts made to the procurement office”, the Apel decision says.

The Court of Appeals raised several questions about the evidence of the Demaj reactor.

If this witness was presented to the court to testify in the name of justice, then the question is why I never mentioned these facts before when it was considered that he was heard in the police on witness quality. How can a person in his calibre take part in the talks about an illegal initiative of the procurement procedure and not prevent it so much more when he was a Finance Prorector and why I don't report the case to the police at the time when he realized that the” contract had been changed, it is said in the Court of Appeals Act.

In October of last year, Enver Hasani was found guilty and sentenced to 1 year in prison on bail for the period of verification two years, while the defendants' protection had filed complaints at the Court of Appeals.

The other two indictees, Albert Rakipi and Hakif Veliu, had also been convicted.

According to the Kosovo Special Prosecutor's Act, Enver Hasani in the quality of Pristina University's rector, Hakif Veliu as chief of procurement at the UPP and Albert Rakipi as director of the Institute for International Studies ISN, were accused of committing criminal work of fraud in office in co-ordination.

The prosecution claims the accused had carried out this work in connection with the realisation of the contract to translate books from English into Albanian for the needs of the UPI.

The two other indictees of this process, the Court of Appeals, have burdened them with sentences of a 1 year prison sentence, while the University of Pristina has instructed him in civil procedure to implement a wealth of judicial demand. /Cashho. com/