NATO sees no threat to security in Kosovo

NATO does not see any real threat to the stability and security of Kosovo and the region, but the situation is estimated fragile “because of the impasse in dialogue between Belgrade and Pristina, and therefore must avoid provocative political message and actions on both sides.

So they have told the agency “Beta” in Brussels the sources at NATO headquarters, stressing that “Serbian President Aleksandar Vuciq is right when he says any conflict in the region would significantly turn that area back”.

Sources in Brussels have added that it is “fully natural” that President Vuciq and other Serbian leaders in contact with NATO leaders seek to influence Pristina to implement what has been agreed and signed in dialogue with Belgrade, because dialogue leads to a more sustainable solution and that a more advanced and democratic Kosovo and Serbia will certainly understand and co-operate better.

NATO officials stressed that Serbia is now a candidate for membership in the European Union and that security and stability are crucial for this.

They stressed that KFOR will continue to ensure the security and security of all residents and that “NATO regrets claims that Serbs in northern Kosovo are not protected”.

Here is a <x0-retoric political” that also concerns the development of dialogue between Belgrade and Pristina, consider NATO experts, who convey developments in Kosovo and the Balkans and say it is completely contrary to messages NATO receives from top Serbian officials, and that is that KFOR is a factor of stability in Kosovo.

The Atlantic Alliance strongly supports dialogue between Belgrade and Pristina, because, as mentioned, this is a long-term process leading to stability and security in the region and NATO will do everything to preserve stability, precisely because dialogue cannot be guided properly if the situation is not sustainable and there is no security.

Sources in Brussels say that “, instead of inflammatory rhetoric, Pristina and Belgrade, will have to return, not some expectations that major progress will constantly be achieved, but continually small steps to implement what has been agreed on”. /Telegraphy/