Bombings in Syria: The success of intervention is ridiculed

The phrase used by Donald Trump “Mission was successfully carried out” [ang. Mission accomplicated has been scoffed at by many different commentators. The Syrian regime itself has said it has fired over 70 U.S., France and Great Britain missiles, offering video hygienes for these cases. Commentators said the bombings represented one [...]
The phrase used by Donald Trump “Mission was successfully carried out” [ang. Mission accomplicated has been scoffed at by many different commentators. The Syrian regime itself has said it has fired over 70 U.S., France and Great Britain missiles, offering video hygienes for these cases.
Commentators have said the bombings represented a major escalation of Western confrontation with Bashar al-Assad, the ally of Russia's superpower, but that it was impossible to change the course of this multilateral war that killed at least half a million people in just seven years, Periscopi broadcasts.
The <x0->mission was successfully conducted” was used by George W. Bush for the Iraqi intervention.
A statement that proved to be completely reckless and urgent, and that has been used in many cases in mockery, especially by democratic party politicians. What stemmed from the intervention in Iraq was far from successful, and led to new and bloody wars.
Even Democrat Congressman Ted Lieu wrote on Twitter last night, saying: “What Bush and Trump aren't getting here is that “Mission was successfully performed” for tactical missions is not equal to a strategy. Far from it. ”
US Ambassador to the UN Nikki Haley said yesterday Washington was willing to attack again if chemical weapons were used in any other case by the Syrian regime, writes Periscope.
Trump himself has responded to mockery and criticism of words used by expressing his pride with the military, saying it would be the best ever.” /Periscopi












