Agim Sahin proves guilt for fraud and injury to creditors

Also, because of the same criminal acts, Appeals has proven his sentence to 18 months in prison on bail, even Skender Sahin, the brother of the head of GDP, Agim Sahin, writes the Justice Vow.

According to the act of the Constitutional Court in Mitrovica, declared on February 9th of last year, the Sahin brothers had been convicted of criminal acts of fraud and injury to creditors, and were sentenced to 18 months in prison, which the sentence would not be executed unless convicts carried out other criminal acts within two years after the full might of the sentence.

Disgusted with the act of first degree, the complaint at Appeals had filed the Constitutional Prosecution in Mitrovica, which had called for Appeals, to have the sentences of effective prison sentences pronounced against the accused.

The complaint at the Appeals had also featured the defender of Agim Sahin, the lawyer Granit Vokshi and Siljeman Klinkaku, Skender Sahin's defence lawyer.

The defense of the accused had sought from Appeals that, due to lack of evidence, he freed Agim and Skender Sahin from the prosecution, or that the case be turned into retrial.

This, since as the defense claimed, the first degree of judgment is further subject to substantial violations of procedural provisions, violation of criminal law, and error or complete confirmation of the actual situation.

However, these unfounded defense claims have rejected the Court of Appeals' college.

“The Court of Appeals found that the above complaint claims by defenders Agim Sahini and Skender Sahin do not stand, because the complaining indictment does not contain substantial violations of the criminal procedure provisions allegedly filed with complaints, nor other violations which this Court has imposed on them according to official duty, which were conditioned to annul”, reportedly in the act of Apel, provided by “Betim for Justice<3fax.

On the other hand, according to Apel's college assessment, the first degree act is clear, concrete and contains no contradiction either to himself or to his reasoning.

According to the Appeals, the first degree has made the assessment and analysis of all administered evidence by presenting to them even its claims, which Apel has as rights approved.

Likewise, Appeals has rejected the defence claims that the actual situation has not been proven right by the first degree, because according to Appeals' assessment, from the first-intensified evidence, witness evidence, the statement of authorised representatives of the injury, as well as part of alleged statements has been proven that the accused Agim together have cheated on the credit given “TEB Bank” USA, headquartered in Vushtrri.

In the end, Appeals has also refused the prosecution's request for harshing the conviction of the accused after, according to Appeals, with sentences pronounced by the first degree, the goal of the pre-priced sentence -- the rehabilitation of perpetrators, the prevention of perpetrators from future criminal acts, the establishment of morality and the strengthening of the obligation to abide by the law, respectively.

Otherwise, Agim Sahini and Skender Sahini were charged with, together, cheating the damaged, credit-giving “TEB Bank” USA, headquartered in Vushtrri.

According to the indictment, this has been done by signing agreements on withdrawal, agreement on literature, as well as agreement on hostage with the Union's credit to Sahin, as a responsible person of “Besarti Company” S.P.K.

According to the indictment, accused Agim Sahini and Skender Sahini as a joint recipient loan and signatory of the credit-card deal “VISA” on “TEB Bank” The US, on behalf of Agim Sahin, has used bank products, and since January 2011 they have failed to pay the return of the loan to a total of 253,000 euros, and this has resulted in the damage to the creditor. T EB Bank United States.

The same, as it says in the indictment, in order to bring themselves or the other rich benefits, has put the damaged “TEB Bank” The US, headquartered in Vushtrri, so to avoid debt, they have established new company “Sucrakos '%, while in ensuring the fulfillment of the loan, they have offered as fake parcel mortgages with No.0220715, the firm's stock “Besari Company” and other assets of this firm hostageed to be carried to the firm “Sukrakos”

That way, according to the prosecution, accused Agim Sahini and Skender Sahini, failing to fulfill the obligation to injure the same have caused damage to many of the 253.00 euro.