This is the only way to cancel the nation's path

Currently, Albanian citizens pay about 120m euros in taxes from circulation (507 million litres of annual oil consumption by 2016 x 32 leks + VAT. While the funds the state budget allocated for road maintenance last year, including the route of the Nation was about $3 billion, or 22m euros. This is the equivalent of 18 percent of the tax issued by 2016 and of the destination of maintenance.

Justice Yll Manjani claims that citizens or consumer associations can basically file charges in connection with multiple taxation. However, according to him, this indictment cannot be considered as the country is currently without the Constitutional Court.

“Sic knows the outcome of the mandate of the 4 members of the Constitutional Court has left this court without majority to function. So without solving this case, there are no judgments. But that does not mean that the indictment does not rise. It can be deposited and host the completion of seats in the court to review”, explained Mr. Manyan.

Mr. Manyan says this issue deserves a full analysis and assessment from the view of compliance with the constitution.

According to him, providing national roads in private management is a known practice in the world. But the state allows this kind of management only in conditions where the route given to the private to build or manage is an alternative route to the public road.

So the principle is that the state is tasked with ensuring the movement of goods and people on public roads. To that end, people pay taxes, the renowned lawyer is further expressed.

He said that, for public access to public roads, the state could not charge any money or additional fees, because it was paid through the tax. Private is always alternative service. Of course better, faster and safer. Over this service, the user pays the price or uses the public road. This is the principled bed of construction and road management in any state, regardless of the form or political regime that leads it, he added.

Now if we take and analyze the legality or constitutionality of the nation's road concession, compared to this set of principles that I just mentioned, we'll see that there are issues that merit clarification” further analyse the expert, asking some questions.

First we need to know how much money from the general taxation gets across this street and what form?

-Secondly, how much money does oil tax raise?

- Thirdly what are the flow flows, and what are the expectations now that the tax applies?

- Fourth, does the public road work? Is the nation's path called alternative or ordinary route?

- Fifth, how does circulation affect the country's economic indicators?

The information from the answer to these questions will give me a clearer view of the legality of the contract. These facts would also require constitutional judgment, he added

But after all, the consumer has always the right to defend itself. The judgment object is essentially a little delicate, but fair. Exactly building such a lawsuit requires information from the answer to the questions above. However, I insist that the fundamental discussion remains the right to public access to public roads that the public pays through taxes. Alternative ways can be private. About this subject, there's going to have to be a <x1. /montor/