Opposition positions talk about dialogue with Serbia

Dialogue with Serbia remains one of the main topics now and many years in Kosovo.

It is also considered, except as a condition for Kosovo's EU integration, even one of the topics challenging Kosovo the most.

Rexhep Hoti From the PDK, talking about this process, has said it is more than a local agenda.

The question of dialogue is the nationwide and separate agenda of Kosovo. It's an agenda, not just the console, but more than that”.

The “Dialog is the philosophy that relates to the Albanian internal factor, but also to its external factor. Dialogue proves the functionality of the state of Kosovo in many ways. Dialogue is a desert for Serbia gradually to leave its past, to integrate with itself, with false identity, in relation to the region to integration”.

“Dialogue is very complex, in recent years we've recorded. The performance should always be high, overparty, should be an official policy that should not be contested at the level of creating party policies”.

But for Hyseni Hydenis From Vetevendosje, the problem with dialogue between Kosovo and Serbia is the approach.

According to him, Pristina and official Belgrade have seen this process differently.

And if the states don't know each other as a state, that might be the problem with our approach”.

We have approached this issue, such as non-binding dialogue. Dialogue intellectuals, journalists, writers. It is seen as a process of dialogue on technical issues when it is known to be political”.

Kosovo has been talking about technical issues, but Belgrade has considered it political. It has targeted and achieved political benefits. Serbia is surprisingly leaving other countries behind in the European integration process”.

The main reaction is that we've entered with an agenda that wasn't ours, we haven't made efforts to become part, and we've agreed to be more of a subject than”.

For the Democratic League of Kosovo, dialogue with the state of Serbia must occur and there is no other option.

Driton Selmanaj It has also indicated that Serbia and Kosovo have different goals in this process.

The request for dialogue came as a result of Kosovo's inability to extend sovereignty, to advance interethnic reports in Kosovo”.

The “came up with a creative idea that the EU is not intermediation but fasilizing”.

“Did we expect to have great results, were not satisfied, were not expecting miracles that happened quickly that we entered this” process.

Serbia will increase its role in Kosovo, Kosovo to recognise independence, with two different goals it is a problem to succeed”.

“The LDK views dialogue as alternate. Are we satisfied? Normally not because we have adopted a resolution that has imposed on the prime minister after each round announces the Parliament. There's been lack or access completely non-transparent”.

Brian Kuci By the AAK, it has declared that all parties are pro-dignging dialogue, regardless of what they want to conclude or how this dialogue develops.

We have “behind consensus that dialogue with Serbia should happen. The political platform, which will be the level, we have doubts but we have to have dialogue, all political subjects have told yes to dialogue. We have changes on the platform and what we want to reach”.

Our “aim, besides overhauling the reports, to approach Serbia as a neighbour, has been to be functional in the entire territory of Kosovo”.

The second “has been for Serbia to accept us as a state and third to secure seats in the United Nations. If we've reached one, it's succeeded”.

We need to be together the opposition and position, we demand that all political subjects in the dialogue be involved that it is subject to vital interest in Kosovo”.

“The epilogue is important, we're close to the epilogue, it could be 2019 when we end up with epilogue. The presence of the United States should be inevitable, because we have traveled together in this process”.