3 minutes agoConstitutional Court does not interpret president's bid for CEC
Periskopi(8 years ago)
(8 years ago)Kosovo President Hashim Thaci had requested interpretation by the Constitutional Court of Kosovo in terms of the Central Election Commission, whether by which parliamentary groups should be appointed members of the CEC, by parliamentary groups that have emerged from political subjects that have won the elections for the Kosovo Assembly or by parliamentary groups forming [...]
Kosovo President Hashim Thaci had requested interpretation by the Constitutional Court of Kosovo in terms of the Central Election Commission, whether by which parliamentary groups should be appointed members of the CEC, by parliamentary groups that have emerged from political subjects that have won the elections for the Kosovo Assembly or by parliamentary groups that are created after the constitution of the Republic of Kosovo.
The Constitution says that the forger, President Thaci, his request for interpretation of Article 139 (4) of the Constitution, had relied on Article 84 (9), as well as Article 112, paragraph 1 of the Constitution.
In this regard, the Court clarified that the Constitutional Court, according to Article 113, paragraph 1 of the Constitution has jurisdiction to decide only on cases filed before it legally by the authorised side.
So, “The court found that cases raised by the forger before the Court do not enter the scope of jurisdiction of the Constitutional Court, as defined by Article 113. Consequently, in accordance with Article 113, paragraph 1 of the Constitution, the Court concluded that demand is unacceptable”.
