5 hours agoAppeal decides on the 2010 murder in Pec, decision is made on Granit Elshan
Periskopi(8 years ago)
(8 years ago)The year 2010 in Pec had begun with killing and wounding of three people, since one of the discotheques of this town had introduced a person with two pistols and shot them into a bar. These shots had resulted in Besart Shabby's life and the injury of Valdet Kelmendi and Arta [...]
These shots had resulted in Besart Shabi's life and the wound of Valdet Kelmendi and Arta Bardhit, to be wounded later, police official Hasan Buckaj.
The prosecution claimed that the two-gun club gun was Granit Elshani, who aimed at revenge, who on May 30th of this year was confirmed by the Constitutional Court in Pec, which Elshan found guilty and tried 25 years in prison.
The Foundation's decision did not take approval of the Court of Appeals after she decided to turn this case into retrial.
In the decision he made. KALLXO.com, the Court of Appeals has praised the slide of the act of prejudice as contrary to the reasoning and paperwork of the subject, assessing that reasons and crucial facts have not been presented and calling the act of first degree as contradictory to itself and the reasons given.
The second-instance court has estimated that there is a contradiction even among the testimony of witnesses to the description of the person who shot.
There's a difference between witnesses about the description of the person who fired the gun. Each of the witnesses describes the person's appearance in various ways, while witness Jevdet Kelmendi, whose belief the court has pardoned, in reasoning on the judgment, describes his statement completely without giving a conclusion on which part of the declaration is based”, is highlighted in the act of decision of the Court of Appeals.
Appeal requires that the case of Granit Elshan be rejudged once again in order to eliminate contradictions in the device and in the reasoning of judgment and requires that evidence be administered again.
