Gashi: I have been seeking total blockades of Serbian goods for years

Astrit Gashi analyst through a publication on the social network “Facebook” has sounded the Government's current decision to raise the tax on Serbian products from 10 to 100 percent, Periscope reports. Gashi has written that he has not personally consumed a Serbian product for 10 years, since he says he does not...
Gashi has written that he has not personally consumed a Serbian product for 10 years, since he says he has failed to support the enemy with his money, regardless of the financial situation.
Over the years, Gashi says he has sought a total blockade of Serbian goods.
Read his full reaction:
For 10 years, more precisely because of the burning of customs points in the north, no Serbian goods were consumed -- although I haven't been any useer of them even earlier, mainly for the fact that there were quality offers on the market.
I didn't wear them, even when I put a few cents in my pocket, even when I had more money.
I just couldn't support the enemy with my money- despite the financial situation I've been in, while you've even had goods in the market.
At the same time, I've been trying to use as many local products as possible, knowing that he has to give a <x0boost” even when there's not much quality to get to.
When the state was silent until the Serb fascists who were known as a football huligan gave us property, I have politically supported the fall of trucks with Serbian goods always considering that anyone who does it has criminal responsibility. But a voice had to be raised, an eye open and the thought is we're feeding our death.
So over the years I have even searched for it, though often completely alone, a total blockade of Serbian goods with political intent. I continue to think that in this unequaled struggle between a country that has only 10 years and another with a very long-term experience, the only <x0joker” in hand is to stop the money through market closure.
I am an unimproved believer in market freedom, but also in the belief that the state is never meant for itself without being willing to protect it from enemies with all democratic means and if necessary through personal financial costs. We've done this in the early 1990s, why don't we do it now. The state is not built yet.
I wonder, but what if this action doesn't have a full effect or just part of it at all? The answer is, why would we care once that we didn't use every means to make the state, even if he failed us.
You'd rather fail to try than do anything.
Today's decision is fantastic, he just needs to deepen. If it's just gonna be a short dream, don't wake me up, as Green Day says in an old song, “until September is done”. 2019.












