Professor of UPP presents victim to power Kadri Wessel: Criticism and ridicule of the letter are lily

Albanian-language and journalism professor at the University of Pristina, Nundman Pacarizi, estimates that the Kosovo Parliament Speaker's position towards the Special Court is consistent, saying that criticism of people over his stance -- expressed today through a column -- is bulism. Contrary to what is known to be the method of persons [...]
Despite what is known to be the approach of the most powerful persons to hurt or intimidate the weaker, Pasharizi thinks that Wessel himself is a victim in this case, even though he and his party have real power at some point in Kosovo.
Therefore, prior to the slight mockery of us turning into confusion, the letter will be read and analyzed seriously, as the letter of the Kosovo Parliament Speaker, who does not object to the involvement of entire teams of advisers to draw up such an important letter, on such an important and sensitive issue”, he writes in a Facebook response.
His reaction is started by saying that Wessel's letter is neither simple nor easy to interpret, claiming that it is one of the few who have picked up the message between the lines of that attitude.
Kadri Veseli's <x0lumna, published today is not such a simple and easily performable letter, so it's not so easy, either in the design of positions or in the authorship plan, for which props of Facebook have started the race. Kadri Wessel's writing with nothing is no change in his attitudes, but it testifies to the consistency of his attitudes. Internally, as a structure, text is cohesive, as in the work of breaking their ideas and rankings, as in the plan of writing techniques. So whether Kadri Wessel has given the last hand to this text, or someone has looked at that text (which would be more than normal), the text has the inconsistent authorship of Mr. Wessel, having been in full sync with his ups and downs, including bringing the winter vacation convention to”, writes on top of the pavariz, which is recently confirmed as an analyst.
READ BEAH: DRAMATU GRU CADRI VESEL
According to UP's professor, Wessel with this letter has clarified his position, not only as head of the party's Parliament, but also as leader of the war, which, according to him, through the Special Court is proving to be balnished.
Paris does not mention anywhere that it was Wessel's own party that forced its deputies to vote on the Special, bringing him to the polls for the second time, as he had not been voted for the first time.
With this letter, Kadri Wessel has tested allies and opponents. With this letter, he has clarified his position, not only as speaker of the Parliament, the most influential party president in the past two decades, but also as one of the leaders of the war, which is trying to balhet or shine through the Special Court, since we were not seriously taken into this subject ourselves. So far, Kadri Wessel's letter is clear. She lacks a stand, or a clear attitude regarding coalition partners, if it is not said in the sentence about initials who did not take their initiative to the end”, he writes.
He has demanded that Wessel not be mocked, which says that he turns into confusion but is read and analyzed, as if no one had done so.
In fact, the pararizi slips even to the level of insult to Wessel's critics, saying that “the volume of reading doesn't dare to be compensated with resounding”.
Therefore, prior to the slight mockery of us transforming into confusion, the letter will read and seriously analyze, as the letter of the Kosovo Parliament Speaker, which does not conflict with the involvement of entire teams of advisers to draw up such an important letter, for such an important and sensitive issue. Each paragraph is read and performable. The difficulty of reading cannot be compensated for the confusion. That letter can be heard for predictive analysis. Let's read it together. Without prejudgment, he wrote, and then we're exorcised or desperate. /Periscopi/












