Kurteshi explains his public communications, has a request for Dardan Moliqaj

I have called it illegal, and I continue to call it, (against status), his attempt to separate from our Vetevendosje activists until he is a member of the Movement, because that is neither status nor moral. He wrote.

Kurteshi has written that he has not contested Moliqaj's VV visit, which are usually conducted in co-ordination with the Headship or Secretary General.

He has said he would welcome whether Moliqaj would run for VV chairman and would commit to creating equal conditions for the two candidates.

Kurteshi has asked Moliqaj to respect the statue.

” Mollijqaj has the opportunity to act under the old roof or to build a new one, it depends on him, what I'm asking him is respect for the Stattu, in the design of which he and he contributed himself, until it is declared to be a member of the Vetevendosje Movement. ”

Here's the complete post of Ishmael Kurtesh on Facebook:

Two Explains

My two public communications during the past week, some performers misdesigned courses from some readers and some performers may have been misunderstood, so I consider it necessary to make the following clarifications:

1. On January 14th, my word to members of the Council of the Pristina Centre by some media was interpreted as <x0 threat”, despite the fact that neither in text nor subtext nor a word poses a threat. After all, my word has been recorded by the information tools that conveyed that event, it would be good for those who have appreciated my speech as threatening to explain to the public how they base this quality, otherwise such a comparison remains unconventional and perhaps even biased.
2. On January 18th, following complaints by several Vetevendosje activists that MP and Vetevendosje Movement member Mr. Dardan Moliqaj, is belonging to the structures in several Vetevendosje Centres and at these meetings you are talking about dividing Vetevendosje and establishing a new party. Based on the responsibilities I currently have on the Vetevendosje Movement I thought it was my official duty to react.

In my reaction I have by no means contested Mr. Moliqaj at the Centres of the Vetevendosje, even though activities are usually done in the movement with the Chief, or Secretary General.

I have not disputed the debate with activists or his opinion against any situation.

I would have even greeted Mr. Moliqaj for the Chairman of the Vetevendosje Movement and of course I would have committed myself to creating completely equal conditions with his candidate during the election campaign and to the maximum respect of each of his supporters' rights in the fields, if he had run.

I would also consider his commitment to establishing a new political subject as well as his attempt to convince Vetevendosje activists to join his subject, but only after leaving Vetevendosje.

I have called it illegal, (against status), his attempt to separate our activists from Vetevendosje until he is a member of the Movement, because that is neither status nor moral.

1. Molyqaj has the opportunity to act under the old roof or build a new one, it depends on him, what I'm asking him is respect for the Statu, in drawing up which he too contributed to himself, as it is claimed to be a member of the Vetevendosje Movement.

Ishmael Kurteshi