The government of the Parliament is afraid of the consequences of decisions on Special Demarketing, taking matters to each other.

In December of last year, Kosovo's government has prosecuted the Kosovo Parliament's Agreement on Marking the Border Line with Montenegro, including the new State Commission's report on State Border Marking and Maintaining. However, Kosovo Prime Minister Ramush Haradinaj has stressed that he opposes ratification of the current agreement.

On the other hand, the Kosovo Parliament's Headship on 22 January, the 43 deputies' request for abolishing the Law for Specialised Chambers and the Specialised Prosecutor's Office, known as the Special Court, has sent it to the Government of Kosovo to give the final opinion.

Recognitionaries of political developments, the actions of the Government and the Assembly, have described as “playing table tennis” with two themes, as they called them, the hottest political.

Politologist Belul Beqa, professor of Political Sciences, tells Radio Free Europe that Government and Parliament are afraid of the consequences that can bring, whatever, regarding both issues.

The table game is an expression of inefficiency for decision making, because even if a decision is made on the demarcation, the Special Court Law will be implied for those making decisions respectively. The consequences imply that the coalition must also be dissolved and be moved to a new election, for which neither side is currently ready. Therefore, they are striving as long as possible and the more subtle the decision-making process is postponed”, Beqa says.

Analyst Arton Muhajari has similar thoughts. Speaking to Radio Free Europe, he stresses that all that is happening between the Government and the Assembly is an attempt to blame for mutually not making major decisions.

“do not want to face the consequences of those decisions. This is the main problem and we have a kind of fear, a kind of escape from responsibility also from the government, but also from the Kosovo Assembly. Both institutions flee from their political and moral obligations to find solutions to major problems facing the Kosovo state and Kosovo society in general”, Muhramiri points out.

However, politicologist Beqa believes that however both issues are voted on, the consequences are inevitable for the ruling political parties themselves.

I think the consequences are inevitable. If abolished (the Special Court Law), the consequences will be much greater even for Kosovo and its citizens. The difference is only in whether we want to have small or large consequences. In the meantime, their scheme is leading to the greatest length of time in which they will be in power. This is all the essence”, Beqa estimates.

Analyst Muhhaxhiri estimates that the Government and the Parliament, putting specific issues on each other, are buying out until they are forced to make decisions.

This bizar table tennis cannot last indefinitely, so specifically in terms of Special Court and Demarketing. The moment it takes courage and willingness to face these two major issues, the Government and Parliament play table tennis and try to buy time. This is done in a very efficient way and to have a continuation in their treatment, not any idea of their concrete solution, which would be extremely useful for Kosovo citizens and for Kosovo itself”, Mujariri says.

The failure of the Demarcing Agreement with Montenegro remains one of two main obstacles that have left Kosovo without visa liberalisation.

Meanwhile, the initiative for abolishing the Special Court Law has exacerbated reports between Kosovo's institutional leaders and international representatives in the country, especially with Quinti's countries. The latter have even stressed that in the event of abolishing this law, Kosovo will lose the support of countries that have testified as its partner and ally.