5 hours agoKurti, Caday-Bujupi remain in custody
Periskopi(9 years ago)
(9 years ago)Kosovo's Appeals Court has rejected it as unconventional on the appeal of the defendant A.K.'s defence lawyer against ruling out the 1 month detention measure issued by the Constitutional Court in Pristina in 27.11.2017. According to the Court, A.K. Together with D.K.-B., A.H. and F.T. They are being accused because of the work [...]
Kosovo's Appeals Court has rejected it as unconventional on the appeal of the defendant A.K.'s defence lawyer against ruling out the 1 month detention measure issued by the Constitutional Court in Pristina in 27.11.2017.
According to the Court, A.K. Together with D.K.-B., A.H. and F.T. They are being charged because of criminal offence: “Using the weapon or dangerous tool” from Article 375 paragraph 1 of the Kosovo Criminal Code and Criminal Work; “Pegim of the official person in performing official duty” from Article 409 of the same code.
The three-judge professional co-leggy of this court has assessed that the pleas of defence are not based, because it appears to emerge from the subject paperwork, the accused A.K. and the D.K. -B. with 26.11.2017, violated the measure of house arrest assigned by the Court of Appeals in 25.11.2017. So according to the Court of Appeals, the first-degree court has acted correctly, when they have been assigned the detention measure, the constitutional condition of Article 183 paragphai 5 concerning Article 187 paragraph 3 of the Penal Procedure Code”, says the statement.
