Dergut apologises to Albin Kurti, also speaks of party differences

The shipment has apologised to Kurt and each Vetevendosje member for the language used, which it says is out of the normal framework for discussion.

Insisting Drorgi has indicated that her response comes after some of the deep political and organisational differences she has with people within the party.

There's been a time within our organization that is aiming to install a certain way of thinking politics that conditions distrust and fear among activists and members, where, through slanders and insinuations, lies and half-truths, public degradation and political elimination of certain people has been targeted. She told you.

Aida Durguti says problems and disagreements should try to solve them all together.

We remember today I had a conversation in Viber, where Dorg had named Albin Kurtin mu*.

Here's her full reaction:

After publishing part of internal discussion between the Parliamentary Group of Movement V I feel the need to apologize, and to explain what has been published. I apologize first to Albin, and then to every member of Movement V. THE public opinion of the language used and expressed in that discussion. I didn't do this until now because I wanted to do it first before Albin when he was released from prison where he was being held unjustly. As it is now, the public has to do so.
The language I've used in the communication of the MP group is out of the normal context of discussion. Being this way is unacceptable and unwarranted. Such a reaction comes after some of the deep political and organizational differences I have with people assigned to Movement V. EVIDENCE! It has long been intended within our organization to install a certain way of thinking political action that conditions distrust and fear among activists and members, where, through slander and insinuations, lies and half-truths, public degradation and political elimination of certain people has been targeted. This endangers the movement because it installs a political thought in which democracy and genuine principled discussion of our political attitudes and organizational decisions drown.
These problems and disagreements have been lasting for over a year. I was constantly involved in trying to solve them. This will be the V's organizational power I'm sorry. But our efforts have been undermined and are still undermined by certain people. Even today, I don't know who agrees with these problems, instead of solving them in the media? I don't understand who's interested in having a public lynching process for V's people. Is that so?
These are problems we have to solve together. Through frank, self - sacrifice discussions. Through democracy and democratisation. Within the organization. V That's right. V That's all it can be.