Court: These are excusing evidence in the plea against Vetevendosje activists

The trial with which VV activists were sentenced is said to be responsible for some similar attacks taken in a similar way. The court has assessed as circumstantial evidence in the act of Vetevendosje activists transcripts of Frasher Krasniqi's conversation to another person. By these transcripts it turns out that during development [...]
The trial with which VV activists were sentenced is said to be responsible for some similar attacks taken in a similar way.
The court has assessed as circumstantial evidence in the act of Vetevendosje activists transcripts of Frasher Krasniqi's conversation to another person.
By these transcripts it turns out that in the course of conversation, the person NN is now addressing indictee Frasher Krasniqi, telling him what you have had an unconnected knee there at RTK do not follow up on nonsense, do not dwell in riots”, says the indictment.
It also mentions Frasher Krasniqi's response.
The accused Frasher answers to what he says, hey, boy, cadal that these are serious charges (...) as the accused Frascher continues the conversation by saying "we" to RTK, "xy bomb and xi, we are completely against" ”, says the indictment.
Even as circumstantial evidence has been mentioned in the attack on Murat Meha's home, the responsibility for which was taken by evugovas”.
The “for which the attack was also claimed responsibility by so-called Rugovas via e-mail. 23.08.2016, in which a similar form was held responsibility for the attack on Murat Mesheh”, it is said in the indictment.
The reason for the attack was the same as the preservation of Kosovo's land and the warning that their attacks have become increasingly severe, and the speech was the same”, further said in the act.
The surrounding test has also been described as the attack on the RTK building.
Tests for activists are considered photo images sent to the FBI for clarification and DNA expertise reports.
The bias indicates that the FBI has found that “these images have not been favourable for analysis and comparison”.
While DNA traces taken from the site of the event compared to the accused's DNA profiles, according to the 1808.2016 expert report, they had no connection with the accused.
“From all these evidence, not authenticated DNA of human origin, or that has been linked to one of the accused,”, is said to be in court.
Citing these excusing evidence, the court appreciates the actions of the accused as very cautious and well thought out.
“The DNA of any trace of human origin, which once again shows the way the accused is now acting, a well-thinking way of doing things, in order to keep no trace of the case for carrying out these incriminating actions”, is said in the act.
KA LLXO.com secured yesterday the act written for the four condemned activists of the Vetevendosje Movement.











