Court says it was based on this evidence when it condemned VVA activists

Exactly 31 days after he pronounced 21 years in prison against four Vetevendosje Movement activists charged with the attack on Kosovo's Parliament, the Pristina Constitutional Court has compiled the full sentence regarding the case.

KA LLXO.com has exclusively secured the bias and reasoning it condemned Vetevendosje activists.

The 41-page act describes material evidence, circumstantial evidence, excusing evidence and the claims of indictees and their defenders.

Judge Becir Kaluldra, who has compiled the act, has listed the evidence on which he supported the act by starting with the burnt motorcycle, communications between the accused, bought phone cards and other relevant evidence.

“Moctocy found burning, and it has also proved that the motorcycle was bought and directed by the plaintiffs and Egzon, and that the same has been used to carry out the criminal work”, it is said in court.

In addition to this evidence, which in the court is listed as a crotch, the court also mentions testimony from witness Heset Ramadani.

The trial estimates that this material evidence confirms the fact that the very motorcycle that witness Heset Ramadani has now sold to the accused and Egzon is the motorcycle that has been found and burned after carrying out the attack on the Kosovo Assembly. After the Hesset witness has been able to secure the documents of the person on whose behalf was the motorcyclette prior to and on behalf of the person Sahit Hasan, from whom he has even now bought witness Hesset Ramadan as evidenced by the photoadum of August 5, 2016, or photos 15, 16,17, and 18 is the same number of falsia”, argued in the indictment.

Among the estimated material evidence, according to the court, also mentions recordings taken from the ETC security cameras.

“In videos taken from security cameras located on the outside of the ETC, it is seen that accused Attrain Arifi is running a red-colored engine while at a nearby distance the accused Egzon Haliti is now standing, while now that the vehicle of the late Astrit Dehari is parked near the edge of 11x1>, describes the act of prejudice.

As further material evidence in this case, the court also listed video recording cameras where the prosecution claims that Adea Batusha looks like buying the phone.

“Gjykata estimates that of these recordings administered in the quality of material evidence the fact that accused Adea Batusha on August 5th 2016 has now bought the phone and sent the same text to accused Frasher Krasniqi, from whom the phone was then sent over-composure as the top”, is described in the indictment.

In the court, it further argues that besides the videos there are claims and that witness statements support them.

This material evidence is also in line with the testimony of witness Naser Mustafa, who has now described accused Adea Batushha in the same way as it appears in video footage taken along her journey to the place where they bought the phone and her departure in the direction of the village of the accused Frasher Krasniqi and also the time when this accused bought the phone, the kid she had in her hand, the glasses, the” bag, described in the indictment.

Except for the witness, Mustafa, the court also mentions the testimony of witness Zogiani.

And also with the testimony of witness Remzi Zogiani, who has identified the accused Adea as the person who on the critical day has sent him to the chambers of commerce and as well as the path he has described in the case of sending to this address”, it is said in court.

KA LLXO.com during the day will also bring the plea of the trial regarding the circumstantial evidence, excusing evidence, as well as the assessment of the defendants' defence in this case.