This justifies Ziadin Sela's loss

Ziadin Sela wants to become a political protagonist again and whenever he is in difficult political situations, he cites the serious events of April 27th. On Thursday he went even farther on his charges that if they are what he tells him, pointing his finger at his bombers, this [...]
On Thursday he went further off with his charges that if they are as he tells him, pointing to his bombers, this should testify in high judicial institutions and not on the despair and anger of losing you bring grief at those who showed you the door of defeat, because by making grave accusations of attempted assassinations this is only to escape the post-election moment when he must give responsibility for the defeat of Struga and with automatism the post of the Alliance.
He once again accused DUI leader Thursday, but after the April events, he joined the government together with Ali Ahmeti. At the time he did not mention these “facts”, he then shared power with the one who charges the serious charges. There are unimaginable developments in the political course, but it seems that the Sela more to save politically wants to produce other situations to distract attention elsewhere, escape the defeat of Merko who invaded the municipality and sent to a large loser Sela who came to politics with the great philosophy of Arber Xhaferi, and now with statements and fierce accusations undisputed against the real attackers, will give life to his political position of wavering, even over time.
The seat at any cost will be identical to the political ancestors who turn defeat into victory and want to stay in politics at any cost, while the excuse is found at a moment that has been like a bad episode, but you can always mention April 27th, you can make such serious accusations without storing all the facts if what you say is true or a manipulation for opinion to justify defeat and to look like <x0ikone<x1) when you can actually be but you are not.
If Ali Ahmeti or anyone else were the director of the assassination, then why Sela joined him and then he seemed so excited at meetings with Ali Ahmeti. I even smiled at a table with the permanent winner, making Sela as if she were in the seventh heaven. The Sela forgets that she was winged with Ali Ahmeti after April 27th and just why she's all different now. He didn't even mention that story at the time, because he wanted to be part of the government. But at the moment that Silas shook her political career, he lost the bus to justify the real bombers. The sad personal stories on the difficult political road and in that April 27th sequence must be distinguished from this new moment. The headquarters since a leader with a “sizes target went to the Communist den, becoming politically extinct, but through the loss of that municipality, showed that there is no size of giant politician. He already has two paths. The first to find the real directors of his beating on April 27th, and that's what I do through judicial paths at relevant institutions and not with the political alleged statements, and the second is to give the responsibility for losing in Struga if there is a bit of conscience that you're going to lose your resignation, or otherwise it's the kind of politicians who come to the political scene, but it's hard to take root from there, mutating in the policy that is more profitable than with national purposes as promoted.











