What happened? Three weeks ago, the prosecutor had declared that there is no evidence against VVA activists to attack the Parliament.

Vetevendosje activists have been found guilty of the attack on the Assembly, but exactly three weeks ago, on October 26th, prosecutor Abdurrahim Islami had declared that there was no evidence linking the accused to the completion of the work. During the trial management in the case of the attack on the Kosovo Assembly, what four activists [...] are accused of.
Vetevendosje activists have been found guilty of the attack on the Assembly, but exactly three weeks ago, on October 26th, prosecutor Abdurrahim Islami had declared that there was no evidence linking the accused to the completion of the work.
During the trial management in the case of the attack against the Kosovo Assembly, on which four activists of the Vetevendosje Movement are accused, Special Prosecutor Abdurrahim Islami said that by DNA expert, the dacitilloscopic expert and other evidence, there is no evidence that directly links the accused to performing the work.
Following the prosecutor's statement, lawyer Ramiz Krasniqi said he does not know what is left for the defence to declare when the prosecutor all the evidence he presented is excusing evidence.
And this is the professional behaviour of the prosecutor that applied the code of procedure provisions to propose excusing evidence”, said lawyer Krasniqi.
I will continue where the prosecutor left him to convince the court that this case has no proof. The FBI's latest report that says that scaw evidence confirms the presence of indictees in the video location of”, the lawyer added.
Then DNA samples and grafology expertise and typeography are negative and do not turn out that the accused are involved in this case, he added.
“miss lab results related to explosive vehicle, lack data from motorcycle expertise. We never learned how the motorcycle once completely burned and then partly”, lawyer Ramiz Krasniqi added.
Our doubts have always been that the motorcycle is located in that place and that I don't want to speculate who did this”, he stressed.
While lawyer Tome Gashi said all that has been proven so far is that the attack on Kosovo's most important building has occurred at the location and timing and no one opposes it.
However, the prosecutor has failed with material evidence to prove that the accused of this case are the perpetrators of the” attack, said lawyer Gashi.
In this case, accused of attacking by explosive means against the Kosovo Parliament building are At and Arifi, Egzon Haliti, Adea Batusha and Frasher Krasniqi.
Vetevendosje's four activists are accused of the attack committed in August 2016, reports the kalox.
The four indictees of this case had been declared innocent at the session, held on February 28th this year, while the indictment had called it political, while their requests for dropping the indictment and breaking the procedure were rejected by the Constitutional Court.











