A new blow to Kosovo justice

Following investigations by the Constitutional Prosecutor in Pristina, under the monitoring of the European Union's Mission for Endimmation of Law, EULEX, it turned out that Lumez had not forged the exam.

But professionals from the field of justice say all this development left a bad impression on the country's justice system.

Former State Prosecutor Tahir Rrecaj, currently a lawyer, says such cases damage image and confidence in the justice system.

I consider that this has been a sensitive case and seriously damaged the State Prosecutor's institution, taking into account the fact that Mr. Lumez is at the top of the pyramid of the justice system, the chief state prosecutor. However, the positive outcome of this case, which has resulted in the fact that Mr. Lumez has not made fakes, is a decision that could at least ease the image of the State Prosecutorial Institute”, Rrecaj said.

Meanwhile, Chief Prosecutor Alexander Lumezi told Radio Free Europe that, except it has been personally damaged by the charges brought against it, the State Prosecutor's Institute has also been damaged. Since, as he said, such cases affect the weakening of citizens' trust in this institution.

I think that Kosovo's own state has been hit, since information has been invented and invented that the chief prosecutor has not given a jurisdictional exam, and that is done in a sense, to create chaos within judicial authority, which is a very important institution in order to seek changes within this system of”.

However, I think the goal has also been to damage rule of law and fight corruption and organised crime”, Lumez said.

On the other hand, Enver Hasani says he stands behind him that Mr. Lumez has falsified the jurisdictional exam, although the investigation has already become white.

Enver Hasani

Hasan told Radio Free Europe that he stands behind allegations he had made to Lumez, believing he has not completed the jurisdictional exam.

He doesn't have a test, he's got a fake exam. What he's been saying in the act is everything against the law, from the way the investigation started to the act. They have investigated the aging work. This is not the issue of forging, but of using forged documents. Any evidence that is in the decision does not speak as real to”, Hasani said.

On Hasan's charges, Lumezi is not at all at all at all in agreement, which reexpounds the question of his jurisdictional exam.

I gave the jurisdictional exam in 1991 after I completed the practice at the District Court in Pristina and submitted to that test. Then I was in the reprovocation, where the second time I gave this” exam, Lumez said.

Despite the controversy, however, the prosecution has already declared the Lumez case closed.

The Founding Prosecutor in Pristina, the Department of Criminals, through a communique, had confirmed that the process of collecting all necessary information and facts concerning the claims of former Pristina University sector Enver Hasani, that the file of the state chief prosecutor's jurisdiction is forged. In a communiqué issued by the Kosovo Prosecutorial Council, it is said that the investigation of this case was made by a local prosecutor under the ongoing monitoring of a EULEX prosecutor.

After a detailed review of all the information and evidence collected, as well as the statements provided by all official persons who in the early 1990s were responsible for managing the process of presentation and registration of the test of jurisdiction, as well as the release of certificates for this exam, the Constitutional Prosecution has concluded that Mr. Hasani's claims are not true, because they are not based on facts and do not comply with evidence collected”, the media release is said.