You ask if Thaci threatened Surroi in Rambouille, Rubin: Physical Threat From That Moral Threat

For this, the witness said he is not aware and that he said that he must make the difference between physical threats and morality, reports “Justice Trust”, broadcast Periscope.

Initially, a BBC video doctor was introduced to the witness, in which the reporter said the focus was on the Albanian delegation. He said this delegation had chosen an inexperienced and young person as their leader, Hashim Thaci. He said that the entire delegation urged Thaci to accept the agreement, but that he refused because the agreement had not included anything with independence.

It was said that a person named Dugi Gorani said the delegation appointed Thaci as chairman, not knowing they could return to their prisoners.

Veton Surroi had said it was a “but” excellent from all sides, except Thaci was very cut, because “said no”.

Gorani went on to say Thaci was very nice and told the delegation see this document, this formulation is completely unacceptable.

Surroi said Thaci used the threatening language -- and could be understood as a threat. And Gorani told Thaci he had been told that anyone who now signed this document would consider him an enemy of the nation.

Rubin stressed that he thinks these two people were not part of the KLA in the delegation, and he knew only Surroi.

Asked whether he was aware that Thaci had indirectly or clearly threatened such ones. Rubin said he must separate the physical threat from that morality.

Let's split the physical threat from that morale. No, I wasn't aware that there was a physical threat, but I know there was after ideological pressure for or against independence because it was key to moving during the war. So Madeleine Albright has also threatened Hashim Thaci. He threatened him and told him that if you didn't sign up, you're leaving people vulnerable to Serbs, and of course I heard that Mr. Demacchi” has been threatened, James Rubin said.

The court has accepted the transcripts of the September 3, 2023 recordings from the detention facility. The prosecution had requested replacing the transcript with an up-to-date version. Since there was no opposition from the parties, the revised version of these transfers was put on material evidence.

It was also ordered that some material along with relevant translations be rescripted as public.

It is noteworthy that all the accused are physically present in the courtroom similar to the two days before.