SPACE submits Veliaj file to trial: 13 counts for mayor, 12 for Ayala Xoxa

According to the official SPAK announcement, Veliaj is charged with:

1. “Passive corruption of top state functionaries or local elected”, Done in co-operation, in terms of the irregular benefit received by “Agi Cons” shpk, predicted by Article 260 and 25 of the Penal Code;

2. “Passive corruption of top state functionaries or local elected”, Done in co-operation, in terms of the irregular benefit taken by “Fusha” shpk, predicted by Article 260 and 25 of the Penal Code;

3. “Passive corruption of top state functionaries or local elected”, Done in co-operation, in terms of the irregular benefit received by “Palush” shpk, predicted by Article 260 and 25 of the Penal Code;

4. “Passive corruption of top state functionaries or local elected”, Done in co-operation, in terms of the irregular benefit taken by “Gerard-A” shpk, provided by Article 260 and 25 of the Penal Code;

5. “Passive corruption of top state functionaries or local elected”, Done in co-operation, in terms of the irregular benefit received by “Contact” shpk, predicted by Article 260 and 25 of the Penal Code;

6. “Passive corruption of top state functionaries or local elected”, Done in co-operation, about the irregular benefit received from “Eventus” One, predicted by Article 260 and 25 of the Penal Code;

7. “Passive corruption of top state functionaries or local elected”, Perform in co-operation, about the irregular benefit received from “Muza” One, predicted by Article 260 and 25 of the Penal Code;

8. “Passive corruption of top state functionaries or local elected”, Done in co-operation, about the irregular benefit received from “BYL-A” One, predicted by Article 260 and 25 of the Penal Code;

9. “Passive Corruption of High State Officers or Local Elections”, Perform in co-operation, about the irregular benefit received from “Frobolous” One, predicted by Article 260 and 25 of the Penal Code;

10. “Purchasing criminal works products or criminal activity”, carried out in co-operation more than once, predicted by Article 287/2 of the Penal Code;

11. “The introduction or maintenance of prohibited items in the institution of execution of prison decisions”, more than once, predicted by Article 324/a/2 of the Penal Code;

Twelve. “Refutation for declaration, contempt, hiding or false declaration of riches, private interests of elected persons and public servants, or any other person who has the legal obligation to declare”, predicted by Article 257/a/2 of the Penal Code;

13. “Disuse of task”, Forecast by Article 248 of Penal Code.

2. Ayala Xoxa, accused of committing a crime:

1. 1. 1. “Passive corruption of top state functionaries or local elected”, Done in co-operation, in terms of the irregular benefit received by “Agi Cons” shpk, predicted by Article 260 and 25 of the Penal Code;
      2. “Passive corruption of top state functionaries or local elected”, Done in co-operation, in terms of the irregular benefit taken by “Fusha” shpk, predicted by Article 260 and 25 of the Penal Code;
      3. “Passive corruption of top state functionaries or local elected”, Done in co-operation, in terms of the irregular benefit received by “Palush” shpk, predicted by Article 260 and 25 of the Penal Code;
      4. “Passive corruption of top state functionaries or local elected”, Done in co-operation, in terms of the irregular benefit taken by “Gerard-A” shpk, provided by Article 260 and 25 of the Penal Code;
      5. “Passive corruption of top state functionaries or local elected”, Done in co-operation, in terms of the irregular benefit received by “Contact” shpk, predicted by Article 260 and 25 of the Penal Code;
      6. “Passive corruption of top state functionaries or local elected”, Done in co-operation, about the irregular benefit received from “Eventus” One, predicted by Article 260 and 25 of the Penal Code;
      7. “Passive corruption of top state functionaries or local elected”, Perform in co-operation, about the irregular benefit received from “Muza” One, predicted by Article 260 and 25 of the Penal Code;
      8. 8. “Passive corruption of top state functionaries or local elected”, Done in co-operation, about the irregular benefit received from “BYL-A” One, predicted by Article 260 and 25 of the Penal Code;
      9. “Passive corruption of top state functionaries or local elected”, Perform in co-operation, about the irregular benefit received from “Frobolous” One, predicted by Article 260 and 25 of the Penal Code;
      10. “Purchasing criminal works products or criminal activity”, Done in co-operation more than once, envisioned by Article 287/2 Penal Code; (other than that, as a person who acted in behalf of the legal person OJF “Harabel”,
      11. “Refutation for declaration, contempt, hiding or false declaration of riches, private interests of elected persons and public servants, or any other person who has the legal obligation to declare”, predicted by Article 257/a/2 of the Penal Code (2 times);
      12.  <x0) Forecast by Article 260 of 25, 287/2, 257/a/2 and 180/1 and 25 of the Criminal Code.

3. Elman Abule, accused of committing “criminal actsCleaning up criminal products or criminal activity”, carried out in co-operation more than once, predicted by Article 287/2 Penal Code, in the name of commercial society “Remetal” shpk;

4. Gentian Sula, accused of committing “criminal actsActive corruption of persons of high state or local officials”, predicted by Article 245 of the Penal Code, on behalf of the commercial society, “Agi Cons” shpk;

5. Fatmir Bektashi, accused of committing “criminal actsActive corruption of persons of high state or local officials”, predicted by Article 245 of the Penal Code, on behalf of commercial society “Contact” shpk;

6. Spider Palushi, accused of committing “criminal actsActive corruption of persons of high state or local officials”, predicted by Article 245 of the Penal Code, on behalf of the commercial society “

7. Rocking Field, accused of committing “criminal actsActive corruption of persons of high state or local officials”, predicted by Article 245 of the Penal Code, on behalf of the commercial society “Fusha” shpk;

8. Sokol Kryeziu, accused of committing “criminal actsActive corruption of persons of high state or local officials”, predicted by Article 245 of the Penal Code, on behalf of the commercial society “Gerard-A” shpk;

9. Mirton LikaWho is accused of committing a crime. <x0) Done in co-operation, provided by Article 180/1 and 25 of the Penal Code, in the name of society “Lani” shpk;

10. Linda Kazan, accused of committing “criminal actsCleaning up criminal products or criminal activity”, performed in co-operation more than once, and “Active corruption of persons of high state or local officials”, predicted by Article 287/2 and 245 of the Penal Code, in the name of the non-profit organisation “Eventus”

11. Erald Simixhiu, accused of committing “criminal actsCleaning up criminal products or criminal activity”, performed in co-operation more than once, and “Active corruption of persons of high state or local officials”, predicted by Article 287/2 and 245 of the Penal Code, in the name of the non-profit organisation “Muza”

Twelve. Ina prettyy, charged with committing criminal acts of “Cleaning up criminal products or criminal activity”, performed in co-operation more than once, and “Active corruption of persons of high state or local officials”, predicted by Article 287/2 and 245 of the Penal Code, in the name of the non-profit organisation “BYL-A”;

13. Fromina Bollo, accused of committing “criminal actsActive corruption of persons of high state or local officials”, predicted by Article 245 of the Penal Code, in the name of the non-profit organisation “Frobolous”

14. Valmir Xoxa, accused of committing “criminal actsCleaning up criminal products or criminal activity”, carried out in co-operation more than once, predicted by Article 287/2 of the Penal Code;

15. Adela Kondakciu, accused of committing “criminal actsCleaning up criminal products or criminal activity”, carried out in co-operation more than once, predicted by Article 287/2 of the Penal Code;

16. Clotilde Bushka, accused of committing a crime “Action preventing truth detection”, Forecast by Article 301 of Penal Code;

17. Flight Gianni, accused of committing a crime False “Declarations in front of judicial police officer”, Forecast by Article 3/05/b of Penal Code;

18. Fatjon BaciWho is accused of committing a crime. “Fueting or withholding forbidden items in the institution of executional decisions”, provided by Article 324/a pgf 2 of the Penal Code;

Nineteen. “Rametal” shpk, charged with committing criminal offence of “Cleaning up criminal products or criminal activity”, carried out in co-operation more than once, predicted by Article 287/2 of the Penal Code;

20. “Agi Cons” shpk, charged with committing criminal offence of “Active corruption of persons of high state or local officials”, predicted by Article 245 of the Penal Code;

21. “Contact” shpk, charged with committing criminal offence of “Active corruption of persons of high state or local officials”, predicted by Article 245 of the Penal Code;

22. “, charged with committing criminal offence of “Active corruption of persons of high state or local officials”, predicted by Article 245 of the Penal Code;

23. “, charged with committing criminal offence of “Active corruption of persons of high state or local officials”, predicted by Article 245 of the Penal Code;

24. “nerd-A”, charged with committing criminal offence of “Active corruption of persons of high state or local officials”, predicted by Article 245 of the Penal Code;

25. “Lani” shpk, charged with committing crime <x0) Done in cooperation, predicted by Article 180/1 and 25 of the Penal Code;

26. OJF “Eventus”, charged with committing criminal offence of “Cleaning up criminal products or criminal activity”, performed in co-operation more than once, and “Active corruption of persons of high state or local officials”, predicted by Article 287/2 and 245 of the Penal Code;

27. OJF “muza”, charged with committing criminal offence of “Cleaning up criminal products or criminal activity”, performed in co-operation more than once, and “Active corruption of persons of high state or local officials”, predicted by Article 287/2 and 245 of the Penal Code;

28. OJF “BYL-A”, charged with committing criminal offence of “Cleaning up criminal products or criminal activity”, performed in co-operation more than once, and “Active corruption of persons of high state or local officials”, predicted by Article 287/2 and 245 of the Penal Code;

29. OJF “Frobolous”, charged with committing criminal offence of “Active corruption of persons of high state or local officials”, predicted by Article 245 of the Penal Code;

Thirty. OJF “Harabel”, charged with committing criminal offence of “Cleaning up criminal products or criminal activity”, carried out in co-operation more than once, provided by Article 287/2 of the Penal Code.

At the conclusion of preliminary investigations, it has resulted in evidence that defendants Erion Veliaj and Ayala XoxaIn their co-operation, in nine separate cases, they have received irregular benefits in the form of monetary sums and real estates, from commercial subjects and nonprofit organisations (mentioned above), which in turn have obtained construction permits and received public funds from Tirana City Hall.

The criminal investigation has collected concrete data, proving beyond any reasonable suspicion, that defendant Erion Veliaj, in the quality of Mayor Tirana, with his signature in every case the distribution of these funds, which have since ended up on the The above-mentioned NGOs, limited-responsibilities societies, physical persons controlled by his wife, defendant Ayla Xoxa, and close individuals.

Also, these defendants, due to the post carried out by citizen Erion Veliaj, have improperly benefited real estate at considerable value by commercial subjects (mentioned above) who have received public funds and construction permits from Tirana City Hall. In all these episodes the defendants, in co-operation with each other, have consumed elements of the criminal act envisioned by Article 260 of the Penal Code.

Associations with limited responsibilities, as well as non-profit organisations mentioned above, providing irregular benefits due to the task committed by defendant Erion Veliaj, have consumed elements envisioned by Article 245 of the Penal Code.

The administered evidence has also proved that these defendants, with their illegal actions committed in co-operation with the cited NGOs and others, more than once, have integrated into the banking system monetary sums secured as irregular benefits, due to the mayor's office in Tirana. Depositing these amounts by hiding or covering the true nature of riches, in the conditions where these assets are known to be products of criminal acts according to Article 260 of the Penal Code, has made complete fulfillment the elements envisioned in the letter a) i n b) to Article 287 of Penal Code, conducted in cooperation and more than once, according to the second paragraph.

This criminal intent of the defendants would be impossible to fulfill, without the defining role of other commercial subjects, pricks and NGOs. In this sense, the proceeding body has concluded that the OJF “Harabel”, “Eventus”, “Muza” and “BYL-A”, physical persons like citizens Valmir Xoxa and Adela Kondakciu, fully controlled by the defendant, Ayala Xoxa, as well as citizen, Elman Abule and society “Remetal” shpk, have committed concrete actions in terms of clearing criminal work products, by transferring assets with the intention of hiding or covering their illegal origin or the integration of money sums into the banking system, knowing that these are the property of criminal work under the 260 Penal Code.

From the preliminary investigation, the Special Prosecutor against Corruption and Organised Crime has provided sufficient evidence to conclude that State Ayala Xoxa, herself or other close to him for a short period of time, has made online purchases that consist in personal dress, in value 86,721, $175.

The collected evidence clearly testifies to the access and circulation of cash in cash, outside the banking system, in considerable sums and in large cuts, by the defendant, Ayla Xoxa, wife of local elect Erion Veliaj.

These amounts, which come as a result of irregular benefits obtained because of the mayor's office in Tirana, have been used to feed among others and the private trade activities of subjects controlled by his wife, organizing events, liquidating salaries, paying insurance, paying rents outside the banking system, etc., thus hiding their true source, the true nature of contractual relations with other private subjects, and therefore avoiding, but not only the payment of obligations under the tax legislation in power.

In this way, defendant Ayla Xoxa, in collaboration with citizen Mirton Lika, in the quality of business subject representative “Lani” shpk, has consumed the elements of the criminal act envisioned by Article 180 of the Penal Code.

Similarly, the criminal investigation has found it not to meet the legal obligations of the local high choice and related person in terms of transparency of property assets, thus hiding them.

Defendant Erion Veliaj and related person, defendant Ayala Xoxa, have committed concrete actions aimed at concealing their real estate in fact, as well as other rich interests stemming from participation in income-generating organisations, thus consuming elements of criminal work envisioned by Article 2507a/2 of the Criminal Code.

In addition to the above, Mayor Tirana, defendant Erion Veliaj, in the exercise of his functions, has committed concrete actions contrary to the law, in not fulfilling the regular duty, in the function of benefiting material goods in an unfair way, but also with concrete consequences to the harm of the interests of citizens and state, in terms of adopting a PDL and following the construction permit for a multiethnic object, on a land area where his wife has rich interests.

Local elected's actions prove to have been carried out in terms of conflict of interest, in the absence of full functional competence, as well as in violation of procedures that the law stipulates for the adoption of an administrative act, as is in concrete case the Local Detajed Plan. This citizen thus proves to have consumed the components of Article 248 of the Penal Code.