Maliqi: James Rubin's testimony is an important historical document

According to him, the testimony of the former senior American gentleman will remain an important historical document.

Rubin's witness, which I believe will be followed by other evidence, is an extremely important historical document that overturns many propagandistic disasters. He dismantles the main argument of the prosecution, which everyone in Kosovo knows with a sense of reason, that the KLA has had the central structure consolidated or and capable of guiding violence and crimes systematically. But it gives the mirror of a decentralised and chaotic group that acted under the circumstances of facing a state of extermination plans that materialised in Bosnia the key context which the prosecution completely bypasses, almost the KLA came up with territory control from the fun point”, it wrote among other things.

Read Maliqi's full reaction:

Ruby's testimony, which I believe will be followed by further evidence, is an extremely important historical document that overturns many propagandistic disasters. He dismantles the main argument of the prosecution, which everyone in Kosovo knows with a sense of reason, that the KLA has had the central structure consolidated or and capable of guiding violence and crimes systematically. But it gives the mirror of a decentralised and chaotic group operating under the circumstances of facing a state of extermination plans that materialised in Bosnia the key context which the prosecution completely bypasses, almost the KLA came out to control the territory from the pleasure point.
Thaci is portrayed as a political figure in managing foreign relations, delegated to this job by commanders who had effective control over the ground, but also attentive to the historical weight of the moment and ready to help Americans push him. U n CH to the west agenda. If anyone thinks that this depreciates his historical weight, I think it does the opposite.
Evidence based on intelligence reports also does not try to deny the existence of diaspora crimes against civilians, but disputes the idea that it has been organised and allulon exactly I would say that it was more a product of chaos and lack of control, and warns that there were Belgrade propaganda. It is clear that the crimes recorded by the prosecution have been more local accounts or revenge attacks, and that their victims deserve justice. But the Special Prosecutor has clearly lost the address of this responsibility by trying to build a political charge, thus producing double injustice.
Ruby's testimony was important for another reason: credibility. He started his testimony by ordering that it was Albright who had founded The Hague Tribunal, and that if someone was reluctant to get involved with war criminals, it was her and Ruby.