Hasan comments on the Constitutional decision: veto right for Serbs, a folly in VV rhetoric

Former Constitutional Court Chairman Enver Hasani has commented on the interpretations being made to the Constitutional's recent decision regarding the Kosovo Parliament's constitutional session.

He has criticised the idea proclaimed by some that this decision gives MPs of the Serb community “absolute” in the Assembly, calling this interpretation incorrect.

“The right to veto was a folly that was created here, in the rhetoric of the duty-made”, Hasani has said.

He added that the Constitution has clearly said that the constitutional hearing has not ended due to the non-election of the deputy head of the Parliament from among the Serb community's deputies, but that does not imply any particular veto for them.

The right of veto can be said to exist, is in constitutional amendments. Second, it's in the special laws on community rights. Even that's where the constitution has been changed, the absolute majority. And there is no other, it's clear as tears. You know that the Kosovo Army has been formed by laws. And today it was formed without a constitutional amendment and you're in the process of forming. Because it's a law rule, you can't take advantage of the unconstitutional and illegal state you create yourself. Neither local Serbs nor Albanians can create the unconstitutional situation, and then say I have absolute right, what is being said veto. The issue has gone to Constitutional, for the same reasons that the constitution of the Parliament has stalled to the choice of Dimal Basha. Since they've found the solution for Dimal Basha here too, they have to vote. And if local Serbs, who saw the preliminary as well as the majority party of the proposal and do not do it at all, that is another” topic, Hasani has added to Debat Plus.

“After 12 days the president will apply to Constitutional” Smakqi shows what happens if he is not respected by the Parliament and the Court's Third Act