What it says in the decision on Dimal Basha's sentence of 25 thousand euros in libel is bound to apologize.

Basha has been indicted by Grainca-former deputy prime minister and businessman for slander and insults in an article written in a portal and several Facebook posts.

Through the July 22nd 2025 decision, the Foundation obliges Basha to withdraw editorial writing published on July 1, 2019, as well as the writings of July 22, 2019, September 10, 2019, January 10, 2020, January 22, 2020, and January 20, 2020, published in its account on the social Facebook network, reports the “Bettim on Justice “.

This Court also imposes the chief parliament to apologise to the plaintiff Grainca, promising he will not repeat insults.

“IT IS the indictee that requests public forgiveness to the plaintiff, who must be at the portal. Where the insulting and defamatory content has been made public, as well as his account on the social network é Facebook, with the promise that he will not repeat such insults, and that, in the eight-day term, from the unpowered day of this act, under threat of legal consequences”, the decision says.

The amount of 25 thousand euros, Basha, is forced to pay with legal interest of 8% from the day of presenting the indictment on July 22nd 2019 to full fulfillment and 15 days from the day of the indomitability of this act under threat of legal consequences -- mandatory completion.

Basha owes the plaintiffs the expenses of the procedure at two thousand and 607 euros. However, the rest of the requirement regarding compensation because of slander and insults -- spiritual suffering at the height of 40 thousand euros -- is rejected as unbashed.

Initially, the Constitutional Court in Ferizaj on July 28th 2022 had issued a lawsuit in which he had refused the prosecution of the Grainca plain as unfounded.

Against this act, the plaintiff's author had filed a complaint within the legal deadline, then the Court of Appeals on November 25th, 2024 had approved the complaint and violated the Constitutional Act, turning the subject into retrial and re-establishment at the first-degree court.

The foundation in the retrial decision, notes that the article published by the indictee on July 1, 2019, in an online media title called “Ferizaj, crime and authorities”, generally expresses the concerns and opinions of a Ferizaj citizen (here indictees), regarding the high constructions of wild creations; and from this article it is generally seen that the indictee has conducted a broad analysis of the chaotic situation that he was prevalent in this municipality. But it is also evident that the indictee in this scripture has now ascribed the accuser with various satirical, ironic, and insulting labels.

This level of public opinion debate by the indictee passes into the sphere of slander and insult and in this part of the statement . Minister, this supermen also has time to get paid by the Ferizaj Community, where it's in the role of Councilman of the Ferizaj municipality. So it has roles in all positions and it's paid for all of them by taxpayers, as long as there are also private businesses of millions...

It says that the mayor of the municipality through the January 19th 2018 decision had indicated that the plaintiff for his work would be compensated for by the deputy minister's salary.

However, in the part where it says that this supermen find time to get paid even by the Ferizaj municipality, the founder says that Basha has obviously spent her political satire using as an ironic label to question the way the plaintiff benefits from his office's exercise and that by alluding to two pay positions, presenting her as a public official benefiting from the same budget, as extortioners of public goods.

In the decision, it is also said to be alluding to quick wealth without legal and illegal grounds.

And for Facebook posts, the Foundation finds that in certain situations there are ad-hoc resentment and reactions to a certain phenomenon or phenomenon.

“... The indictee in most of the writings he has made against the plaintiff, turns out to have been holding the post of MP of the Republic of Kosovo, and these insults, slander and insults against the plaintiffs, in certain parts of his statements, would not conflict with the law as if they had been committed during a political debate between two government, public or MPs, but these were made by a personal account in the social network, Fawbookúr, with which they have passed the level of public debate and freedom of expression, say the Feriz Court.

Basha's Facebook posts, the Foundation says they present insults and insults, hitting the plaintiff's personality.

“... The indictee goes to the extent that with his metaphylology incriminates the plaintiff, identifying him as a criminal, ʹmafie (partit of criminal groups), corrupt them, so these are serious accusations that directly violate his moral and professional integrity”, the Court estimates.

The decision says the labels, metaphors and expressions used by Basha have been a direct attack on Grainca.

The court came to the conclusion that the indictee is responsible for his statements with insulting restraint and that such action is due to cause for damage to the plaintiff's reputation.

Because, the indictee, he made the slandering and insulting statements on the portal I.” and on the personal network “Facebook”, holds the indictee responsible here for the used expressions and opinions expressed on them and for this reason, has forced the indictee to withdraw the statement published in the published article portal “I.i” with the date 01.07.2019 as well as to draw the writings of the dates 22.07.2019, 10,09.2019, 10,01.2020, 22,01.2020 and 30.01.2020 published in his social network account {Facebook; and to ask for public forgiveness to the plaintiffs in the same way that he has distributed slander and insult to”, in the verdict.

The court came to the conclusion that the amount of 25 thousand euros serves the moral satistrophy for damage to reputation.

The founder has refused the height of the indictment's application of Grainca in the amount of 40 thousand euros, as it has received on the basis that despite the fact that the chief parliament is responsible for insulting the plaintiff's personality, the amount deemed as the IV point of the device of this act, represents sufficient moral satifa for the damage done, and that eventually the judgment of a much higher one would exceed the purpose of the Law, the truth of slander and insult.

Against this act is allowed complaints in the 15-day deadline of accession to the Court of Appeals through this trial.

Otherwise, plaintiff Grainca on July 22, 2019, at the Foundation Court in Ferizaj, through his authorised, has filed charges of slander and insults against indictees Dimal Basha, with claims that given the plaintiff's business activity and public office, on July 1, 2019, by an editorial writing in a portal, he had insulted and slandered the plaintiffs.

The decision states that the plaintiff had published the article, entitled “Ferizaj, Crime and Powers”, on July 1, 2019, and a series of Facebook posts, through which he slandered and insulted the plaintiff.

As for indictee Basha on February 6, 2020, had filed an answer in the indictment, where he had been denied the plaintiff's request.. /Periscopi/