VV at <x0)

What indicators did parties give so far?

Vetevendosje Movement Chairman Albin Kurti responded a little nervously and not quite clearly when asked by journalists if they would respect this Constitutional Court decision.

We must expect full judgment. We had it on June 26th, August 8th, but this one on August 8th is just notice”, Kurti said while walking without stopping to answer journalists' questions.

But his party's reaction was severe and accused the court of violating the Constitution.

For this decision, Vetevendosje said that “poses dangerous deviation from constitutional role” and that “ai is contrary to the fundamental principles of rule of law and division of powers”.

The court has chosen to bring about arbitrary rules. The invention of completely new rules in the middle of the process and substantial interference in the competencies of the Parliament is violation of constitutional order. The Constitution approves and changes the Assembly. Taking on this competence by usurping the constitutional role of the Parliament is a blow to the democratic system that is sourced to the sovereign. There are no other known forms of writing and rewrite, approval of changing the Constitution. It either makes the Assembly or the popular referendum. Members of the Constitutional Court are subject neither to one nor the other. When an organ that should be the Guardian of the Constitution begins to produce new standards or meet standards that are not pre-principled either in the Constitution, or by the legislature, it is then transformed into an unconstitutional body”, Vetevendosje said.

This statement was reiterated at a media conference by Vetevendosje's chief parliament candidate, Albulen Haxhiu, who also continues to be acting Minister of Justice.

Haxhiu also rejected the pledge her party will have to implement to propose the candidate/a candidate for the post of chief parliament that must be resolved through open voting, which can only be realised up to 3 times for the same candidate/rest.

Haxhiu, who has failed to be resolved for dozens of times, questioned that number.

“Why not twice, four times, ten times?”

Despite Vetevendosje's rejection of the acts brought by the Constitutional Constitution in their favour, Haxhiu gave indications that they would observe this act.

Show me just one case when we say we don't respect the Constitutional Court's decision. Of course, the Constitutional Court's decisions are respected”, she said at the conference.

On the other hand, the Democratic Party of Kosovo enjoyed that decision. Its leader, Memli Krasniqi, said they had confidence in the Constitution when they sent the subject.

In the face of this behavior, we chose the path of caution, legitimacy and belief in the Constitution. As a Parliamentary Group The PDK, we took this initiative with full responsibility towards citizens and constitutional order. With firm faith in the right and in the country's Constitution, we addressed the Constitutional Court to end this deliberate and dangerous crisis for democracy”.

He said the Constitutional Court sealed what they said after each session: “Vetevendosje has held the Republic of Kosovo's Parliament hostage, deliberately blocking and planning its functioning for narrow power interests, with actions completely outside the constitution”.

The Constitution has obliged all Parliament deputies to attend and vote when the first party puts their candidate's name for the top parliament to vote.

Even the chairman of the Democratic League of Kosovo, Lumir Abdixhiku, after the Constitutional Court ruling, said what they had said about the blockade in the Parliament was confirmed.

The Constitutional Court gave full justice to our requests and the subject drafted by the LDK. As we had said, how many times, the first party had usurped the speaker, with the implantation had changed the agenda and obstinately over 48 times violated the Constitution of Kosovo by insisting on the secret vote before and after the Constitutional Court's act of”, he said.

From the AAK, Deputy Chairman Ardian Djind said that “won democracy, the dictatorship” was dropped.

With this Constitutional Court Act, one thing is clear: Kosovo is not and cannot become dictatorship. The VV should propose the candidate for Chief Parliamentary and MPs vote in the open vote. One candidate's proposal cannot be abused indefinitely. The state cannot be held hostage just for the ill ambitions of a person”, he wrote.

Meanwhile, his associate party, Time Kadrijaj, had a question for Vetevendosje: “How will you lie to the people now!”

Now how will you interpret the Constitutional Court's decision? Not that you didn't understand the previous decision, but he's conditioned you to block the state. Now you're going to change if you get”, she added./Periscopi/