Kryeziu requests answers from Osman: What have you done to remove the Serb judge who endangers the state?

Kryeziu, in a written response, said these questions are essential to understanding whether the president has acted in accordance with constitutional competencies and responsibilities, following claims of dangerous activities by Judge Radomir Laban.

Osmani, at a media conference Tuesday, said the decision to withdraw the demand was an immediate reaction, following official information from the security institutions related to Laban's activity in 2018, 2021 and 2024. It considered the “absurd” that protection of constitutional order could be trusted with someone who, according to security data, risks it.

In this context, Kadri Kryeziu seeks answers to the following:

Have you communicated with the last president and current president of the Constitutional Court about these findings of security organs?

Are these the findings of well-planned security organs beyond any given doubt?

Have you talked to other members of the Constitutional Court on this matter?

Have you suggested that, in light of these findings, the Constitutional Court initiate the procedure to recommend the dismissal of the judge?

Kryeziu points out that Article 118 of the Constitution credits the president of the Republic with dismissing a Constitutional Court judge, but only with the proposal of two-thirds of the members of this court, and in cases where serious crime or serious contempt of duties are proven.

“The activity that endangers the constitutional order, according to the Republic of Kosovo Criminal Code, is considered a serious crime”, he says, adding that his questions are not political, but constitutional and institutional nature.

In the end, Kryeziu points out that the wide “opinion needs precise clarity and argumenting”, because, according to him, “anything else is an act that damages the seriousness of the Republic institutions. ”/Periscopi/