The Constitution leaves MPs in the spasis: Making Measured Decisions

By August 8th, citizens' elected were barred from any further action around the Assembly. This ban is a temporary constitutional measure to protect constitutional order and institutional integrity.

The court's decision has also been commented on by political politician and political connoisseur Fahredin Majkovci. He stresses that the behaviour of political parties in recent months has produced uncertainty, disappointment and political and institutional damage, which citizens experience at the end of the day. According to him, when the constitutional vacuum becomes evident, it is the Constitutional Court that has the essential role to provide interpretations that fill gaps and restore the needed balance.

In turn, the Constitutional Court's recent ruling may be considered one of the most reasonable and intended solutions to emerge from an unprecedented situation in the country's political life. Moreover, the pre-skirt decision, which set a 30-day deadline, was an important step towards establishing an institutional order. In the meantime, the last decision, although it first produces a “pause”, can basically be read as a shot step”He says.

According to Majkovci, the court has offered this space to make a cautious decision.

“In this regard, the Court seems to have taken into account the actual state of the political system, providing space for a prudent decision making, and, if necessary, for a further interpretation that would crystallise the right way out of this --”, He says.

The polythologist sees this Constitutional decision even as an attempt to protect citizens from repeated sessions.

For the end of the day, this decision can also be interpreted as an attempt to protect citizens from repeated and unsuccessful political sessions, which only increase public frustration and undermine trust in institutions”He appreciates you.