Banned visits to The Hague praised as human rights violations

The decision to ban former President Hashim Thaci's visits to The Hague's Centre of Pre-prisonment, from the perspective of judges of justice, is estimated to violate human rights. Meanwhile, the defence has already indicated that it plans that, under the evidence in the case of KLA leaders, to use the evidence of [...]
The decision to ban former President Hashim Thaci's visits to The Hague's Centre of Pre-prisonment, from the perspective of judges of justice, is estimated to violate human rights.
Meanwhile, the defence has already revealed that it plans that, under the evidence in the case of KLA leaders, to use the evidence of former American State Secretary Madeleine Albright, Richard Holbrooke, Senator Doll and some other important personalities.
The Special Court has published on its page the decision to prevent visits by former President Hashim Thaci's relatives to the detention centre in The Hague. This decision, from a lawyer's point of view, is a violation of human rights.
“It is extremely illegal, the prosecutor's request to deal with the case of who to visit the accused, because during the detention, the judge of the preliminary procedure is the one who cares for the accused, the suspect to the extent of the detention, then is the chairman of the court, now we have the chairman of the court in no form, and in no way does the prosecutor have the right to present any requests contrary to the code of criminal procedure that is even contrary to the Convention on Human Rights, said Sunder Musa, a special court attorney.
He once advised him, and now the Special Court has stopped his visit to custody. Following the prosecution's request, Artan Behram and 10 other people, with the verdict of the pre-procedure judge, will no longer have the opportunity to meet with former President Hashim Thaci, who is being held in custody almost now and five years.
The Special Court of Restriction's decision is just a show, and it aims to draw attention to an event which is a milestone in the political trial against KLA leaders, yesterday witnessed that Albright's testimony would be in front of Serbia's forged documents, that evidence of Ambassador Holbrooke will eventually be faced with evidence of Nazim Blace, that William Walker's testimony will be faced with evidence of one who had said that the KLA had produced magic, so we are talking about an extraordinary quality of witnesses that would eventually overturn all the court's special claims against the KLA leader, Artar Thaci said.
Behram, among other things, estimates that if the court ruling is not in favour of KLA leaders, the situation in the country could be destabilised.
Meanwhile, the defence Tuesday reported that it plans that, under the evidence in the case of KLA leaders, to use the testimony of former US State Secretary Madeleine Albright, Richard Holbrooke, Senator Doll and several other important personalities. /rtk/ Periscope.












