With the abolition of the Order for Co-ordination, dismissed from position and remembered Munich

The Kosovo Prosecutorial Council (KPK) in the extraordinary meeting with the number 271 has abolished the decision to adopt the Order for completion/reforming of the Order for the establishment and functioning of the Commission for Co-ordination and Combating Economic Crime (KKLKE), leaving the position of prosecutor, Kujtim Munishi. Munich was appointed to the position of National Fighting Co-ordinator [...]
The Kosovo Prosecutorial Council (KPK) in the extraordinary meeting with the number 271 has abolished the decision to adopt the Order for completion/reforming of the Order for the establishment and functioning of the Commission for Co-ordination and Combating Economic Crime (KKLKE), leaving the position of prosecutor, Kujtim Munishi.
Munich was nominated to the position of the National Co-ordinator for Combating Economic Crime, in the Council's 266th meeting, reports “Justice Trust “.
However, at the extraordinary meeting on Monday, the decision to approve this regulation has been abolished, which right after its completion/changing had been appointed to the position of co-ordinator- prosecutor Munich.
But that with this Council decision, Munish remains without this position.
The Council's decision came after the Supreme Court through the July 14th 2025 ruling has approved as the founding suit of the plaintiff-Prosecutor Albania Fazliu against the Kosovo Prosecutorial Council (KPK) and declared it illegal and abolished Rule No.04/2025 for Change and Co-ordination of the National Co-ordinator for Combating Economic Crime.
Otherwise, the Supreme One estimated that the indictee- The KKP has without co-ordination with the memorandum signatory institutions, has changed regulation through an internal institutional processing group, and has taken significant action: retroactively limiting a mandate that was initially short of time defined. It says that the indictment has not offered sufficient clarification as to what was the purpose of changing the regulation, in the circumstances when the plaintiff Fazliu -- as the national co-ordinator, has been conducting the post consistently since his appointment in 2013, nor if there has been negative assessment of his performance./Periscopi/












