6 hours ago“The view” of the VV that is diverting the Constitutional Act
Periskopi(a year ago)
(a year ago)Kosovo's Constitutional Court ruled on 26 June that MPs are obliged not later than 30 days to complete the Constitutional Assembly session, electing the chairman and vice president. The Constitutional Court did not rule on the legality of refusing to vote in secret. “The election of the chairman/e and deputy head of the Parliament is a prerequisite for the Assembly to [...]
The Constitutional Court did not rule on the legality of refusing to vote in secret.
“The election of the chairman/s and deputy heads of the Parliament is a prerequisite for the Parliament to start functioning, and this requires all MPs to be present and vote for the constitution's framework so that the latter can start as soon as possible as the body of lawmakers, decision-makers”, the decision was said.
But this is being interpreted in different forms by political parties in the country.
For Faton Pec of Vetevendosje this is happening because of the taste.
“Yes now... the matter of interpretation is also a matter of understanding or taste”, he said.
Then, with “quality” he said he was referring to “the understanding”.
The “currently, in office, nowhere in the Constitutional Court's ruling, is said to have so far the violation of the Constitution”, Peci said.
He said that changing the form of voting for the chief parliament/of “could not be interpreted as a violation of the agenda in the process of constitutionalisation”.
Unlike the VVA, which is not considering a violation of the Constitutional decision, other parties are.
At today's speech star Ariana Musliu-Shoshi (PDK), Besian Mustafa (LDK), and Time Kadriaj (AAK), who demanded that leader Avni Dehari return to the agenda, refusing to propose members for the commission that would organise the secret vote for the chief parliament.
Despite the calls, nothing changed again.
For this, The PDK and LDK have again addressed the Constitutional Court.
Kosovo President Vjosa Osmani has also warned of sending a new subject to the Constitutional Court on the issue of the Assembly's constitutional institution.
If the Assembly is not binding soon, it has suggested that it would be constitutional to seek clarification on the 30-day term mentioned in the indictment.
It has stated that the Constitution must clarify what the legal consequences are if the Assembly is not constitutionalised within the deadline mentioned in the Constitutional Court Act.
What I've mentioned is that when something is binding in a constitutional way, it means that failure to perform the obligation will have legal consequences. It's not that we can expect that the Court will say: well, after 30 days go on the same way. I don't expect that. I plan, if there's no arrangement of the Assembly soon, to address the Court at the request for clarification, about what in 30 days. Because I want it to be explained what the legal consequence is of not carrying out the constitutional obligation of the constitution within 30 days”, Osmani said.
Today, the 43rd unsuccessful effort was made to forge the Kosovo Assembly. /Periscope/
Avni Dehari with the interpretation of the Constitutional Act prompted reactions of the LDK's PDK.
