“The political approach to the judiciary is punishable” -The Supreme Chief reacts sharply to government criticism

Hasan has said that, including the physical person and the legal person, they have the right to submit individual requests to the Constitutional Court to court decisions if they consider their decision to violate any right guaranteed by conventions or Constitutions.

That's what the law says about the Constitutional Court. It is now another issue that this ruling or attachs any of the guaranteed rights to Constitutions and conventions, otherwise the law does not rule out the possibility that the parties... address individual requests at the Constitutional Court”, he said.

He has also spoken about the government officials' charges in relation to the verdict and the judges themselves.

“... Such approach is really punishable, it is really wrong, and it takes this approach of policy to comment on even the court decisions once and for all to stop for the fact that the Supreme Court's decisions are indisputable and incompatible. I do not rule out the possibility that even the Supreme Court's decisions may sometimes prove wrong because even the judge may sometimes err, even though in concrete cases, I do not suspect even a thread in the professionalism of the Supreme Court. However, to comment that way, then by reference, with personal names, it is punitive, and if you look at the content of the lines that the reactionist wrote, in the case of the outgoing minister, there are also doses of denigration, the insults of judges, the humiliation of judges that should not happen in”, he said.

He has said the Supreme Court has ruled that Administrative Guidance has been illegal, adding that after a detailed analysis and debate, those decisions are made on the part of judges.

That decision must be implemented... only refers to the indictment for which there was controversy, namely. It's not about any other decisions at all... its effects lie on an Administrative Guide”, he said.