The lawyer questions whether Osman's request will be addressed: The Constitution has not addressed questions for years

Kosovo President Vjosa Osmani has been addressed today to the Constitutional Court to review the conflict of constitutional competencies from the non-compliance of the Parliament, writes Periscope. In this regard, lawyer Ardian Bayraktari has clarified Osman's request for Periscope, voicing doubts whether this Constitutional one will consider the case. In a proposal for Periscope, [...]
Kosovo President Vjosa Osmani has been addressed today to the Constitutional Court to review the conflict of constitutional competencies from the non-compliance of the Parliament, writes Periscope.
In this regard, lawyer Ardian Bayraktari has clarified Osman's request for Periscope, voicing doubts whether this Constitutional one will consider the case.
In a proposal for Periscope, Bajraktari has stressed that the practice of the Constitutional Court since 2018 has been not to address the requirements addressed in the form of questions, thus raising questions about the fate of the President's initiative.
The president's request to the Constitutional Court should be seen if the Court will examine this case, from 2018 onward, has not been addressed in the form of questions, yet it remains to be seen how it will be handled in the concrete case,” He declared it.
“Crahas demanding clarification of the consequences, the president has also filed a temporary measure request for a suspension of the 30-day court-set deadline, in which the term should be constitutionalised, interpreting Article 66 paragraph 1 of the Constitution. So this deadline is required,” Bayraktari pointed out to Periscope.
He has explained that according to Article 27 of the Law for the Constitutional Court, the latter has the competence to impose temporary measures, whether at the request of the side or at its own initiative, to prevent irreparable damage or whether the action is in public interest.
“E on the provisional measure, according to Article 27 of the Constitutional Court Law, the Court under official duty or at the request of the side could temporarily impose temporary measures on a matter that is subject to procedure, whether these measures are necessary to avoid risks or irreparable damage, or whether taking these temporary measures is in public interest,” The lawyer cleared up.
Finally, Bajraktari has stressed that any temporary measure that can be taken should be in line with the principle of reasonable proportionality and duration.
“ ”He said./ P ERISCOPI/
Here are Osman's seven key demands on the Constitutional (Full document)
Osmani: We have applied for temporary suspension of the 30-day deadline












