Kryeziu asks: Can the Constitution return the term 30 days term to zero if found Dehar has committed violations

This, it says, has been stated that the Headmaster acted arbitraryly and contrary to the Constitution.

Full Posting:

Questions for former constitutional judges, lawyers and law experts: Can the Constitutional Court turn the 30-day zero?

The Constitutional Court is considering two requirements by the LDK and the PDK, which question the way the constitutional session of the Parliament is conducted.

If it is claimed that the Headmaster has acted arbitraryly and contrary to the Constitution, can the Court decide that the 30-day term has not been constitutionally consumed?

We remember Pacolli's case (2011): The move was made by Presidential election but by violations, and the Court turned him to zero. In the current case, no action has been allowed to take place, despite the MPs' political will to fulfill the mandate. That's another form of violation.

The court has yet to provide answers to the manner of leadership. That answer will be crucial: If violations are found, turning to zero is the only constitutional way to protect democratic order.

MPs who have acted in their constitutional faith cannot be penalised, given the mandate for the blockade prompted by an MP with a technical mandate. If the court does not clarify the constitutionality of the session leadership, the consequences will be legitimising an unconstitutional act that risks returning to precedent.