8 hours agoIron Murati sí halts attacks on 3 Supreme judges, calls their decisions “absurde”
Periskopi(a year ago)
(a year ago)Acting Finance Minister Iron Murati, who holds the MP's position at the same time, has continued to attack three Supreme Court judges, who in a recent ruling have found that Murati violated the law when it signed a new administrative directive, since its competence for one thing [...]
Mutate in a post in his account on éfacebook said that since the Convention Constituent session still ended, then based on the Constitutional Act, MPs are acting and, according to him, could have conflict or violation of the law, as the Supreme has concluded.
The incumbent minister this time, he has namedly mentioned the Supreme judges, for which he has been criticised by foreign embassies and missions in Kosovo.
Instead of reading the status on Facebook of opposition deputies, it would be sufficient for three Supreme judges to read the Constitutional Court Act on this issue, so that they would not become so publicly exposed to absurd decisions like this for abolishing the Administrative Guidance of Fiscal Arks”, Murati wrote.
The full delivery of Murat.
According to the Constitutional Court's KO124/25 Act,
So since the constitutional session has yet to be completed, according to the Constablishment point 1 at the Constitutional Court's Ko124/25 Act, MPs have not yet been functioned, and therefore have no access to the post. Without exercising the function, there could be no functional conflict or incompatibility under Article 72 of the Constitution.
When paradoxically, in the recent decision against digitisation of fiscal cases, three judges of the Supreme Court have been issued in interpretations of the Constitution, saying MP's function has been exercised since
This interpretation of these three judges is clearly contrary to what the Constitutional Court itself said weeks ago.
Instead of reading the opposition's Facebook status of MPs, it would be sufficient for three Supreme judges to read the Constitutional Court's Act on this matter to avoid becoming so publicly exposed to absurd decisions like this for abolishing the Administrative Guidance Guide for the Fiscal Arks.
